Australia re-elected to UN Committee on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women

The Australian Government congratulates Ms Natasha Stott Despoja AO on her re-election to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.

The committee is made up of 23 independent human right experts from around the world that monitor the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.

The Convention is a powerful tool to combat gender discrimination and drive genuine progress towards gender equality across the globe. It enshrines women’s rights to equal and meaningful access to political and public life, education, health and employment.

Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator the Hon Penny Wong, commended Ms Stott Despoja on the impact she has had in her first four years on the committee.

“Ms Stott Despoja’s leadership is pivotal to eliminating discrimination against women and girls globally, in our region and at home.

“Through her understanding of international law and treaties, Ms Stott Despoja will be a strong force in the fight to protect and promote women and girl’s human rights.

“She will be an important voice, as the only expert on the committee from the Pacific region.”

Minister for Women, Senator the Hon Katy Gallagher, welcomes Ms Stott Despoja’s re-election, which continues Australia’s global leadership in advancing women and girl’s rights.

“Ms Stott Despoja’s re-election to the committee will enable her to continue work to improve the lives of women around the world, and bring back insights and lessons for us to use as we work towards gender equality at home in Australia.

“In her second term on the committee, she will be an influential global leader for gender equality and advocate for women and girls’ human rights everywhere.”

Ms Stott Despoja will serve on the committee in her personal capacity, commencing on 1 January 2025. This will be her second term on the committee.

Dr Anne Aly to represent Australia at Gaza Humanitarian Conference

This week the Minister for Early Childhood Education and Youth, Dr Anne Aly, will travel to Amman, Jordan on behalf of the Minister for Foreign Affairs to attend an international conference convened by Egypt, Jordan and the United Nations on the urgent humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

Australia has been advocating for urgent humanitarian assistance to reach Palestinians in Gaza in desperate need. We have been clear that Israel must comply with the binding orders of the International Court of Justice, including to enable the provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale.

Since the conflict began on 7 October, Australia has committed $62.5 million in humanitarian assistance to the region, including $41 million to address urgent needs in Gaza. Our funding is being directed to conflict-affected people with a focus on women and children, including to support food, water, medicines, and shelter.

The conference, known as International Call to Action: Urgent Humanitarian Response for Gaza, will be held on 11 June local time.

Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator the Hon Penny Wong:

“This war must end. The human suffering in Gaza is unacceptable. Australia has been part of the international push for a ceasefire, for humanitarian aid to reach Gazans in desperate need, and for hostages to be released. Australia’s participation in this conference is part of that international effort.

“Dr Anne Aly and her family are among many in the Australian community who have lived experience and understanding of the long and devastating conflict in the Middle East. We are fortunate that Dr Aly will bring her deep professional expertise and her perspectives as an Egyptian-born Australian in representing our country at this conference hosted by Egypt, Jordan and the UN.”

Minister for Early Childhood Education and Minister for Youth, the Hon Dr Anne Aly MP:

“The humanitarian situation in Gaza is catastrophic. Over one million Palestinians are facing catastrophic levels of food insecurity and around 1.7 million people have been displaced, many several times over. Humanitarian access remains grossly inadequate.

“Our participation in this conference will emphasise Australia’s ongoing support for diplomatic efforts to end the conflict and to address the humanitarian crisis.”

Greens STATEMENT ON THE TWO-WAY ARMS TRADE WITH THE STATE OF ISRAEL

As the Albanese Government last week teamed up with Peter Dutton’s Coalition to try and make the genocide in Gaza about themselves, there were staggering revelations in Senate Estimates about the scale of Australia’s two-way arms trade with Israel. 

This evidence adds to the body of knowledge on Australia’s two-way arms trade with Israel. We are releasing this statement on the issue to create a more informed debate. 

The fact weapons parts are used in a genocide is “not material” to Labor

At Senate Estimates this week it was revealed that not only does Australia make parts in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, but the fact that Israel using these weapons to bomb Gaza is considered “not material” – basically does not matter – to whether the Albanese Government approves a permit or not. 

Shockingly the evidence provided made clear that it does not matter to this government if the weapons exported by Australia create instability, fuel conflict or are used in human rights violations, as this is simply ‘outweighed’ if the Government deems it to be in the national interest to approve the export.

This is how the Albanese Government can approve military exports to Israel, including indirectly through third countries while maintaining they are complying with domestic law. 

Varley Rafael production of Spike missile parts 

The history of Australia’s export of weapons parts to Israel precedes the current genocide in Gaza. One area of particular contention is the export of parts of the Spike missile into the global supply chain of Israeli weapons manufacturer Rafael Systems. The Spike missile is reported to be the missile that killed Australian aid worker Zomi Frankcom and colleagues. It has killed an unknown number of Palestinians.

Since coming into office the Albanese government has signed fresh contracts valued at over $60 million with Rafael to produce these missiles in Australia for the Australian military, including one as recently as January this year. Prior to this, however, Rafael’s Australian subsidiary Varley Rafael has been producing spike missile parts to feed into Rafael’s global supply chain

In August 2021 (before the contract with the Australian military for the Spike missile) Varley Rafael announced it had already begun local production of the Spike Guided Missile Integration kits. This was said to be the first time the Israeli company had conducted assembly operations overseas. 

To be clear, there was no contract with the Australian government at this time and the production was part of Rafael’s global supply chain. As was widely reported in 2017 when the Varley Rafael operations were commenced: 

“The joint venture also means Varley will become part of Rafael’s global supply chain for Spike missiles, enhancing the company’s export opportunities and giving access to Rafael’s cutting-edge, fifth-generation defence technologies.”  
 
The Greens have never stated that Varley Rafael in Australia exports entire Spike missiles to Israel. Based on the evidence above we have repeated the company’s statements and public media position and said that they are part of the global supply chain for the Spike missile. As such they are complicit in the deaths from that weapon. The fact the Albanese government allows this to continue and then enters into fresh contracts with them in the middle of genocide, makes them complicit too. 

It is extraordinary that media organisations, including the ABC, fail to undertake due diligence about weapons exports. Instead, they rely on comments from the likes of former MP Bob Baldwin, now a “Government Relations” officer for Varley Rafael, that Varley Rafael does not export entire Spike missiles to Israel. The Greens have never said they do.

The $4 billion part Australia plays in the F-35 global supply chain

It was further revealed in budget estimates hearings that Australia’s involvement in the F-35 supply chain is valued at $4.6 billion in contracts through over 70 companies, including as sole global manufacturers for specific parts. As the head contractor for the F-35 Lockheed Martin said: “Every F-35 built contains some Australian parts and components.” This includes the mechanism that allows the F-35 to drop its bombs. 

The F-35 weapons parts from Australia likely go through the US and then to Israel and would not be included in data as direct sales to Israel. As a Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade briefing on trade with Israel makes clear: 

“… service and defence equipment trade is not reflected in the public data, and a significant amount of trade is carried out through third parties such as the US and Singapore.”

However, even keeping in mind that most of the arms trade with Israel is washed through a third country, there is still clear ongoing direct arms trade as set out below. 

Existing military export permits to Israel – what is on the public record

During Senate Estimates questioning Defence revealed that there are currently 66 military export permits active for the State of Israel. These include goods being sent to Israeli manufacturers for repair and uplift, including weapons as part of the two-way arms trade, as well as dual-use goods and parts and components. 

Defence has still not told the public what is in these permits, however, there is clear public information that parts of weapons and military equipment are being exported to Israel from Australia. 

Public information can give an indication of what they are. For example, Currawong Engineering is a Tasmania-based company that creates the Corvid-29 engine, which is used in the Israeli-made Bluebird Aero System’s ThunderB drone. Bisalloy Steels provides military-grade steel for Plasan Re’em, an Israeli company, that makes armoured cars used in occupied Palestine both by the military and the armed settler militias. This is in addition to the Varley Rafael material above.

The Arms Trade Treaty, Australia’s obligations

The Arms Trade Treaty makes it perfectly clear in Article 4 that parts and components of weapons, or conventional arms to use the term in the treaty, are weapons. It was this very article that was invoked by a Dutch court when it ordered the Netherlands Government to stop exporting weapon parts for the F-35 earlier this year. 

Australian Defence officials have attempted to deny that sending weapons parts is covered by the Arms Trade Treaty. This is an interpretation of the treaty that is both novel and dangerous. 

DFAT data on sales of Arms and Ammunition to Israel

Also in Senate Estimates, Defence commented on data released by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade on imports and exports. There is a category within this data set concerning “arms and ammunition”, this is an extremely restrictive category defined by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Over the past five years, this data shows that Australia exports to Israel directly $10 million in “arms and ammunition”. Defence in Senate Estimates stated that recent export data of $1.5 million in February 2024 at the height of the genocide in Gaza, was for a weapon (or weapons) to go to Israel with the intent it will eventually return to Australia as part of the two-way arms trade. 

Australia is quickly becoming an international outlier as Canada voted to halt all arms sales joining Japan, Spain, Italy, Netherlands Belgium and many others in ending weapons exports.

In February 2024 the UN experts also specifically called on Australia and other countries to stop military exports to Israel.

Albanese government’s mid-genocide-commitment of $917 to Elbit Systems 

The claim that the Government is not involved in a contract with Elbit Systems is too ludicrous to give a detailed response. Elbit is subcontracted to Hanwha the main contractor to produce this weapons system for a new Australian infantry fighting vehicle. 

Of course, Australia was required to consent to the sub-contract with Elbit and the government engaged closely on the contract, including ensuring some of the work occurred in targeted electorates in Australia. To suggest otherwise, and for the media to seriously report otherwise, is embarrassing to everyone involved. Elbit is currently making record profits from supplying weapons to the genocide.

Conclusion

The Albanese Government relies on secrecy and misrepresentation to muddy the waters and distract the public from its role in the genocide in Gaza. It thought that constant denial would deter people from looking closer, but the public has not been fooled, so now the Government has turned to accusations to stop the calls for peace. 

It won’t work. See you at the protest on the weekend.

Teens charged following pursuit – Raymond Terrace

Two teenagers have been charged over alleged driving and property offences following a pursuit near Newcastle.

About 9:20pm yesterday (Sunday 9 June 2024), officers attached to Raymond Terrace Highway Patrol were patrolling Mount Hall Road, Raymond Terrace, when they located a white Toyota Corolla which had been reported stolen.

Police attempted to stop the vehicle, however when it allegedly failed to stop as directed, a pursuit was initiated.

Road spikes were successfully deployed, and the vehicle was found a short time later abandoned on Platt Street, Waratah.

The male driver, aged 15, and passengers, a male, aged 18, and female, aged 13, were arrested and taken to Waratah Police Station.

The 15-yer-old was charged with take and drive conveyance without consent of owner, never licensed person drive vehicle on road, Class A motor vehicle exceed speed > 10 km/h and police pursuit – not stop – drive dangerously.

He was refused bail to appear before a Children’s Court today (Monday 10 June 2024).

The 18-year-old was charged with Be carried in conveyance taken without consent of owner.

He was refused bail and appeared in Newcastle Local Court today (Monday 10 June 2024), where he was given conditional bail to appear before Raymond Terrace Local Court on Monday 1 July 2024.

The 13-year-old girl will be dealt with under the Young Offenders Act.

SECOND ESSO/EXXONMOBIL GAS RUPTURE EXPOSED

A second rupture from an offshore Esso/ExxonMobil rig has caused toxic gas condensate to spew into the ocean. 

The revelations come following questioning from Peter Whish-Wilson to the offshore energy regulator Nopsema at Senate Estimates. 

It is the second rupture at a Esso/ExxonMobil rig off the Victorian coast in just two months, in the same area Esso is planning risky carbon capture and storage.

Quotes attributable to Greens spokesperson for healthy oceans, Senator Peter Whish-Wilson:

“Esso/ExxonMobil is proving to be a problematic operator. Its ageing and leaking fossil fuel infrastructure in the Gippsland Basin is a concern for healthy oceans – and so are the laws and regulations that govern Australia’s offshore oil and gas industry which do little to protect our marine wildlife.

“Toxic substances that leak from rig infrastructure are currently self-reported by fossil fuel polluters, and our regulator has limited resources to audit, monitor or inspect this infrastructure. 

“Gas condensate spewing into the ocean can have potentially fatal consequences on marine wildlife. Gas condensate doesn’t form a distinct surface slick like crude oil, meaning it’s almost impossible to contain. Rather, it burns, evaporates and dissolves, with the component that dissolves into the water being acutely toxic and capable of causing catastrophic ecological harm.

“Esso’s inability to manage its infrastructure safely is a huge red flag, especially given the company’s plans for risky carbon capture and storage in the area.

“Fossil fuel corporations make millions from Australia’s offshore oil and gas fields and repeatedly get away with failing to clean up after themselves because our current regulatory framework provides insufficient environmental or economic oversight – how much more must our oceans and marine wildlife suffer before the Albanese government acts to change this?” 

THE GREENS CALL OUT GOVERNMENT’S FRACKING DISASTER – TAMBORAN’S SHENANDOAH SOUTH E&A PROJECT.

“Thanks to NT Labor, Tamboran has moved one step closer to contaminating our water and wrecking our climate. But they’re not there yet.

Tamboran doesn’t have agreement from Traditional Owners, they don’t have agreement from landholders to build their pipeline, they don’t have approvals to build their gas processing plant in the Barkly near the wells, and they don’t have final investment decision.”

“These next few weeks are crucial. The Greens secured the water trigger in Federal Parliament. What is federal Labor going to do? We need Tanya Plibersek to use the water trigger now. This water is belongs to all Territorians. We can’t let Tamboran wreck it for a profit.”

“NT Labor has made it clear again: they’re backing in the fossil fuel corporations during a climate crisis. Unlike Territory Labor and the CLP, the Greens aren’t afraid to stand up to gas corporations in order to protect our water and our climate – because we don’t take their money. We are the only party against fracking in the NT.”

“We have an integrity crisis in the Territory. Our environment minister fronted a press conference with fracking company Tamboran celebrating the NT government signing a deal to buy their fracked gas – and then a few weeks later gave her “independent” sign off on their project saying there was no significant environmental risks to the project. We desperately need some oversight in Parliament.”

“Instead of backdoor supply deals and sign off without independent environmental checks, we need these gas corporations to be properly scrutinised and eventually stopped. That only happens with Green in the NT Parliament after the election.”

80th Anniversary of D-Day

There were many turning points in the Second World War. But one thing is certain: victory against the German war machine, the defeat of Nazi tyranny, and the Liberation of Europe would not have been possible without Operation Neptune – the Normandy landings – and Operation Overlord – the battle for Normandy.

D-Day – June the 6th 1944 – was the day of days.

Winston Churchill called the vast operation ‘the most complicated and difficult that has ever taken place.’ Operation Overlord was years in the making. No effort was spared in planning, arms build-up, training, secrecy, and one of the most sophisticated deception operations in military history – Operation Fortitude.

By the end of D-Day, more than 155,000 Allied troops had secured a foothold in Normandy from which they would go on to win the war in Europe. But the first day of that ‘Great Crusade’ came at a terrible cost with more than 4,400 Allied troops killed.

Today, as a nation, we acknowledge, commemorate, and pay tribute to the 3,200 Australians who were involved in D-Day, including the 13 Australians who were killed. We also pay homage to the thousands more Australians who helped to liberate Europe from tyranny following D-Day, and the hundreds killed over the course of the campaign.

Those who served and sacrificed in the Second World War were truly the Greatest Generation.

On this 80th Anniversary, we are reminded that democracy and freedom are neither the result of luck, nor natural occurrence. We are the beneficiaries and custodians of the great inheritance of democracy and freedom which the Greatest Generation defended and preserved through their service and sacrifice.

Our gratitude to them must never wane. Our duty to them is to never drift into complacency when peace is threatened in our times. Our memory of them must never fade.

Their lives and endeavours are a reminder of the commitment needed to repel tyranny and of the courage needed to preserve liberty. May they continue to be an inspiration to our generation – and those that follow us – of the importance of such commitment and courage.

Lest we forget.

NSW Government passes law introducing police ‘wanding’ search powers

The NSW Government has passed new laws which will tackle knife crime by giving police extra powers to keep knives off our streets and bring in new restrictions relating to the sale of knives to children.

Under the powers, modelled on Queensland’s Jack’s Law, police will be able to use handheld scanners – or electronic metal-detecting ‘wands’ – to stop and scan individuals without a warrant at designated areas. These will include shopping precincts, sporting venues and public transport stations.

These powers will be made available in circumstances where a relevant offence involving weapons, knives, or violence has occurred within the past 12 months.

A declaration can then be made by a senior police officer, enabling police to scan people for a period of 12 hours (with an option to extend as required, as long as the same criteria are met).

The NSW Government thanks Brett and Belinda Beasley and the Queensland Government for sharing their experiences and their knowledge in regard to Jack’s Law.

The Act also increases the maximum penalty for selling a knife to a child under the age of 16 and introduces a new offence prohibiting selling a knife to a child aged 16 or 17 without a reasonable excuse.

The Act amends the Summary Offences Act 1988 (Summary Offences Act) to double the maximum financial penalty for selling a knife to a child under the age of 16 and to introduce a custodial penalty. The maximum penalty is now $11,000, imprisonment for 12 months, or both.

The Act also introduces a new offence into section 11F of the Summary Offences Act that prohibits selling a knife to a child aged 16 or 17 without a reasonable excuse, with provisions for young people needing knives for work or study, such as hospitality students and apprentices in some trades.

The reforms build upon responsible action taken by the NSW Government including:

  • Doubling of the maximum penalties for various knife related offences in 2023.
  • Ongoing high impact NSW Police operations such as “Operation Foil” – an ongoing, targeted operation which last ran from 11–13 April 2024. It targets knife crime and anti-social behaviour with 51 knives/weapons seized and 145 people charged with weapon-related offences.  In the last year alone almost 4000 knives were seized in public places.

NSW Premier Chris Minns said:

“I want to genuinely thank Belinda and Brett Beasley whose advocacy has helped change the law, making NSW a safer place.

“Our state is still shaken following the devastating spate of knife related violence.

“We have taken action to send a clear message that NSW will simply not accept these kinds of crimes.

“These are commonsense changes that strike a careful balance between preserving the rights of individuals and ensuring communities stay safe.”

NSW Attorney General Michael Daley said:

“Recently, as a community, we have witnessed tragic events in NSW.

“These shocking incidents have laid bare how devastating knife crime can be and how the lives of innocent people can be snatched away in an instant. I can’t begin to imagine the pain those who have suffered from knife crime feel and I offer my sincerest condolences to those affected by it.

“We want to ensure that people in the community feel safe and are safe. Rightly, they expect the government to do more to achieve that and this new Act will help to keep our streets safer.

“Knife crime is unacceptable. The ability for police to ‘wand’ people will help prevent people being injured and will deter people from carrying them and increase community safety.

“These tougher maximum penalties highlight the seriousness of knife-related crime.”

NSW Government to end registrars making bail decisions, brings more magistrates on board

The NSW Labor Government will ensure all bail decisions are made by magistrates, as part of its domestic violence response package.

This builds on the Government’s commitment last month to ensure magistrates oversee weekend bail hearings, as the Government provides more information around implementation following further detailed work by the Department of Communities and Justice. 

The Government will invest $34 million over four years, including employing up to six additional magistrates, along with additional costs to be incurred by NSW Police and Legal Aid.

It also includes specialist domestic and family violence training for magistrates and court staff, costs associated with evaluation, and capital funding to ensure audio-visual link facilities are available to support remote bail hearings.

The implementation of the legislation will commence on proclamation in coming months and is being funded from the $45 million announced as part of the Government’s $230 million emergency domestic violence response package.

The Government chose to make this change through an amendment in its domestic violence bail legislation, giving certainty to the Parliament and the community.

Overall, the Government’s domestic, family and sexual violence bail reforms will make it more difficult for those accused of serious domestic violence offences to get bail.

This strengthening of bail laws will expand the show cause test to coercive control and serious domestic violence offences committed against intimate partners, and will require electronic monitoring for alleged serious domestic violence offenders granted bail.

The reforms expand the categories of offences for which bail decisions can be ‘stayed’, while also requiring bail decision-makers to consider domestic abuse risk factors, and to consider the views of victims and their family members.

Attorney General Michael Daley said:

“Registrars have an important place in the administration of the courts but there is now a community expectation that our magistrates are best placed to make these decisions in what are often very difficult circumstances.

“This is one part of a multi-faceted response by the Government to improve our response to domestic, family and sexual violence.”

NSW Government passes law making it more difficult for alleged domestic violence offenders to get bail

The NSW Government has passed new laws to strengthen community safety by making it harder for alleged domestic violence offenders to get bail, and ensuring all bail decisions are made by magistrates.

Under the new law, people charged with serious domestic violence offences will be required to show cause why they should not be detained until their case is determined – reversing the presumption of bail.

This will apply to those charged with offences, in the context of intimate partner relationships, that carry a maximum penalty of 14 or more years jail.

These offences include sexual assault, kidnapping, and choking to render someone unconscious with intent to commit another indictable offence.

If granted bail, these accused offenders will be subject to electronic monitoring, unless the bail authority is satisfied sufficient reasons exist – in the interests of justice – to justify not imposing the condition.

The show cause provision will apply to coercive control, which will be a criminal offence from 1 July 2024.

The amendments also strengthen the unacceptable risk test in the Bail Act. Under these changes, before granting bail, decision makers must consider:

  • ‘red flag’ behaviour that could constitute domestic abuse, such as behaviour that is physically abusive or violent; behaviour that is sexually abusive, coercive or violent; behaviour that is stalking; behaviour that causes death or injury to an animal; behaviour that is verbally abusive; or behaviour that is intimidation.
  • the views of victims and their family members, where available, about safety concerns.

The new legislation will also:

  • expand the categories of offences for which bail decisions can be ‘stayed’, meaning the accused person remains in custody while prosecutors bring a detention application before the Supreme Court.
  • make it easier to prosecute perpetrators who use tracking devices in a domestic violence context.
  • ensure magistrates or judges, rather than registrars, make all bail decisions (not just bail decisions related to domestic violence).

Up to 6 additional magistrates will be employed and the Government will provide funding to ensure audio-visual link facilities are available to support remote bail hearings.

This reform comes after the NSW Government announced a $230 million package to improve the response to domestic and family violence through primary prevention, early intervention and crisis response measures.

The Bail and Other Legislation Amendment (Domestic Violence) Act 2024 amends both the Bail Act 2013 and the Surveillance Devices Act 2007.

Premier Chris Minns said:

“These laws are long overdue and make it harder for alleged domestic violence offenders to get bail.

“They will help keep women and children safer.

“These changes are important as part of work across Government to improve responses to domestic, family and sexual violence.”

Attorney General Michael Daley said:

“The NSW Government has taken urgent action to address the unacceptable rate of domestic violence in our community.

“People accused of serious domestic violence offences against intimate partners will now have to ‘show cause’ why their detention is not justified, and if they are granted bail, they will be subject to electronic monitoring.

“In an important change, all bail matters will now be heard by magistrates and not registrars. This is not a criticism of registrars, who perform important work for their communities.

“These changes to the bail framework are a critical step in addressing domestic violence in NSW.”

Minister for the Prevention of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Jodie Harrison said:

“This reform complements the $230 million package the NSW Government recently announced to improve NSW domestic violence prevention and support.

“Domestic, family, and sexual violence is preventable, and we continue to look for ways to better support the safety of women and children.”

Minister for Corrections Anoulack Chanthivong said:

“Any act of domestic violence is abhorrent, and women have a right to feel safe everywhere in our community.

“Corrections has specialists right now electronically monitoring offenders on parole or serving orders in the community. We are ready to deploy our expertise and know-how to help expand electronic monitoring to the bail system.

“Electronic monitoring forms part of the government’s coordinated approach to disrupt domestic violence across multiple fronts.”