ARC review welcome but NIT and veto have to go

Australian Greens Deputy Leader and Education spokesperson Senator Mehreen Faruqi has welcomed today’s announced review of the Australian Research Council but urged action on a number of fronts.

Senator Faruqi said:

“The Senate inquiry I initiated earlier this year did recommend an independent review, and I’m glad Minister Clare has taken this up. It’s beyond time for a good hard look at the ARC.

“A couple of things are crystal clear: the ministerial veto power and the national interest test have to go. Scrapping the veto power is overwhelmingly backed by universities and researchers.

“The national interest test is completely unnecessary and onerous, and has attracted significant criticism. It has to be ditched, not tweaked.

“The minister can make these changes without delay.

“Let’s go back to first principles: the people who know best about what research to fund are those in the research community. Rigorous peer review is fundamental, but it’s been undermined by politics for far too long.

“The review should not narrow itself to governance and operations. We need to ask the basic question of why we can apparently only afford to fund as few as one in five projects under many schemes, despite vastly more projects being of high quality. A lack of proper funding is really harming Australian research.”

University of Newcastle and Charles Sturt University sign Enforceable Undertakings after underpayments

The University of Newcastle (UON) and Charles Sturt University (CSU) are back-paying staff about $6.2 million and $3.2 million respectively, plus superannuation and interest, and have each signed an Enforceable Undertaking (EU) with the Fair Work Ombudsman.

UON has admitted that between 2014 and 2020, it underpaid 7,595 employees a total of $6,269,241 owed under its applicable Enterprise Agreements and the Fair Work Act 2009. Individual underpayments ranged from less than $1 up to $65,449. The EU requires UON to back-pay all known underpayments, plus a total of more than $171,000 in superannuation and over $1,375,000 interest, by 31 October 2022.

CSU has admitted it breached its relevant Enterprise Agreements when it underpaid 2,526 casuals a total of $3,237,390 between 2015 and 2022. Individual underpayments ranged from $2 up to $58,229. Its EU requires CSU to rectify all underpayments, plus more than $628,000 in interest on wages and about $476,000 in relation to superannuation and related interest, by February 2023.

Fair Work Ombudsman Sandra Parker said both universities had taken the initiative to self-report non-compliance, fully cooperated to provide assurance on their remediation methods and committed to full backpayments.

“Under these Enforceable Undertakings, in addition to making full back-payments, these public universities must implement stringent measures including systems improvements and training to ensure ongoing future compliance for the benefit of all their workers,” Ms Parker said.

“University of Newcastle and Charles Sturt University have shown a clear commitment to acknowledging and fixing the various errors that existed in their systems and practices, and which they should have picked up. Both universities self-disclosed possible contraventions and then worked openly with the FWO on appropriate calculation and remediation methods.”

“The universities sector is a new compliance and enforcement priority for the Fair Work Ombudsman, reflecting our concern about systemic underpayment issues we are finding. We have previously announced investigations into 11 specific universities, commenced a Federal Court case against the University of Melbourne earlier this month, and we expect to be taking further enforcement action against other institutions.”

“The University of Newcastle and Charles Sturt University breaches are examples of why all universities must invest in governance and processes to meet all their employment obligations, including their own enterprise agreements. Universities’ staff, the public and we as the regulator expect them to get it right.”

The University of Newcastle (UON)
UON self-reported an initial underpayment to the FWO in 2020 after staff enquiries from casuals at its Conservatorium of Music revealed $64,600 in underpayments. It then self-initiated an audit of all employee entitlements under applicable Enterprise Agreements.

UON failed to pay correct overtime and penalty rates, underpaid meal allowances and failed to provide minimum engagement hours owed to casuals.

Underpaid UON employees performed work at all main campuses including Newcastle City, Callaghan, Ourimbah and Sydney and worked across various faculties, schools and business units.

The underpaid UON employees, including professionals, academics and teachers, were engaged mainly as casuals but some full-time and part-time staff were affected.

UON’s underpayments were the result of deficiencies in its payroll systems relating to interactions between overtime, allowances and penalty rates; and incorrect application of the clauses in the applicable Enterprise Agreements.

Charles Sturt University (CSU)
CSU self-reported its underpayments to the FWO in 2021 after it commissioned an external review of staff payments in response to widespread reports of underpayment in the higher education sector.

CSU’s breaches related to failures to provide minimum engagement hours for casual professional staff, and underpayment for teaching activities for casual academic staff, including for example failing to pay PhD qualified academics the higher qualified rate and failing to pay for required preparation time for lectures and tutorials.

The underpaid CSU casual employees performed work across all faculties, at all campuses, with the largest underpayments at the Wagga Wagga and Bathurst campuses. Its Computing and Mathematics School had the largest underpayments. The underpaid workers were engaged as academic, teaching or professional support staff.

CSU misapplied minimum engagement periods for casuals; lacked defined guidelines to ensure consistency in the application of minimum academic casual pay rates; and lacked system controls to identify timesheet entries inconsistent with the terms of its Enterprise Agreements.

Under their respective EUs, UON and CSU will provide the FWO with evidence of their system and training improvements to address the issues which led to the underpayments. They must also establish a complaints and review mechanism for underpaid employees.

The FWO’s investigation into the alleged underpayment of University of Melbourne casual academics is ongoing and is separate to the alleged coercion and adverse action that is the focus of its litigation. Some of the FWO’s other university sector investigations have been finalised with a formal caution, while most remain active.

Is it time to talk about rent control in Australia? 

Regulating rent increases could provide cost-of-living relief for those feeling the biggest squeeze.

The rising cost of everyday essentials has most people feeling the pinch. But if you’re a renter and haven’t already been hit with a rent increase, there’s a good chance you’re especially worried.

Property data sources like CoreLogic show rents in Australia are climbing across capital cities and the regions. Meanwhile, vacancy rates are also at record lows – below 1 per cent in some areas – as the demand for rental housing continues to drive up prices.

While landlords have benefited from these stunning rent increases, the real impact is felt by households – many on low incomes – relying on rental housing, says Dr Chris Martin, Senior Research Fellow from the UNSW City Futures Research Centre.

“If there’s a supply response, it just can’t come fast enough,” Dr Martin says. “In the meantime, it’s causing pain to households, many of whom are already in rental stress, and it can displace them from the communities they want to be in or have been in for a long time.”

Currently, tenancy laws regulate the frequency of rent increases – usually no more than once every six or 12 months, depending on the jurisdiction. Tenants can also challenge a rent increase for being excessive to the general market level of rents for comparable premises.

“We currently have very light regulation of rents during tenancies, in terms of frequency of increases and ‘excessive to market’ provisions, and there’s no regulation of rents at the beginning of tenancies at all. It’s just whatever the market will bear,” Dr Martin says.

But greater use of rent regulation, including capping the amounts rents can increase during tenancies, could be one way to help relieve pressure on renters’ pockets and keep them in their homes.

“Proper rent control hasn’t been discussed for a while in Australia, but it’s something that should be on the research and policy agenda,” Dr Martin says.

The argument for controlling rents

Dr Martin says housing is often treated as a means to grow wealth rather than a fundamental need. He says there’s no reason housing shouldn’t be considered, and regulated, like many other essential goods or services are.

“There should be regulation of rents in principle because everyone needs housing, and the consequences of not having it are dire,” Dr Martin says.

Regulating the price of rents would help ease a significant cost of living pressure for households, Dr Martin says. It would better enable renters to stay in their homes through more affordable pricing, while preventing landlords from taking windfall gains at their expense.

“Rents are increasing but not the quality or output of the housing service. This is the problem with property investment: it promises that you can make a lot of money doing absolutely nothing,” Dr Martin says. “A landlord just happens to have acquired property in a place that has become more desirable. In almost all cases, the dwelling quality is declining while they make more gains.”

In the absence of rent regulation, Rent Assistance paid through the social security system is the principal policy intervention for housing affordability in Australia. However, Dr Martin says it isn’t effective enough because many households in need are ineligible, and the amount is insufficient to make market-level rents affordable for many.

“There are about a quarter of a million low-income renters who don’t receive Rent Assistance at all and are paying unaffordable rents,” Dr Martin says. “And for more than a third of people who do receive it, even after accounting for all their Rent Assistance going towards the rent, they’re still in rental stress.”

The other alternative to private rental is the social housing sector. However, the construction of new social housing has stagnated for decades, and what little stock is available can’t keep up with demand.

“While social housing does provide more affordable rents, there’s not nearly enough to meet the needs of everyone who needs it,” Dr Martin says.

Regulation of rents could be pro-housing development, Dr Martin says, as it encourages landlords to increase land use intensity, increasing the availability of rental housing.

“If you’re the owner of land and rents are properly regulated, the way to increase your rental income would be to develop it further. So, rent regulation could be consistent with or even encourage rental housing development.”

Making rent control work in Australia

While you might think rent control in Australia would be innovative, many states – particularly New South Wales – already have a history of rent control measures during economic crises.

Rents were regulated as part of the Fair Rents Act during the First World War, and a form of control was also reintroduced in 1931 during the Great Depression to help make housing more affordable. Rents were also regulated nationally throughout the Second World War, where rents were capped at the 1939 levels.

“To this day, there are still a handful of properties that would be covered by post-war rent control regulations in New South Wales that have kept them well below the market level,” Dr Martin says.

But there are also other forms of rental regulation in many countries today.

Most Canadian provinces have guidelines that stipulate the maximum percentage increase in rent that can be charged in the next year. Ireland introduced location-specific rent regulation where rents are capped at 2 per cent a year in designated ‘rent pressure zones’. Some properties in the United States are also subject to regulation where rents are benchmarked and adjusted to historic price levels.

Dr Martin says capping rent increases in line with the Consumer Price Index could be one of the ways to implement rent control in Australia. The rationale would be that it maintains the real value of the landlord’s return on their investment. In the interim, though, we could return to a temporary freeze on rent increases to alleviate the pressures on renters immediately.

“During the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, some states introduced six-month rent freezes, which helped to keep households in their homes,” Dr Martin says. “We should be looking around the world to see how other countries have successfully implemented rent control for the long term, without being too prescriptive now about any particular method.”

Eliminating no-grounds eviction

Another fundamental reform in tenancy law is needed to make any rent regulation work – strengthening the legal security of tenants. In particular, eviction laws must be reformed for any rent regulation measures to be effective, Dr Martin says.

“If rents are regulated, but you’re not also providing reasonable security for tenants, landlords can threaten tenants with no-grounds evictions to put their properties back onto the market,” Dr Martin says.

Victoria has tightened their tenancy eviction laws recently – no-grounds evictions can only be served at the end of the first fixed term – while Queensland and Tasmania still allow no-grounds termination at the end of any fixed term. All other Australian jurisdictions still allow no-grounds terminations at the end of fixed terms and periodic leases.

Dr Martin says reforms need to go further to ensure landlords can’t unreasonably terminate tenancies without grounds, including at the end of fixed terms, as it undermines every other tenancy right such as challenging a rent increase.

“The legal insecurity of being a renter in Australia is routinely exploited by landlords,” Dr Martin says. “Getting rid of no-grounds terminations is something all jurisdictions should be looking to do right now to better protect renters.”

Greens call on Plibersek to act on global leadership in oceans protection promise

The Greens have called on Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek to take a leading role in convening an emergency meeting with UN member states after a fifth effort to pass a global agreement to protect the world’s oceans and marine life has failed. 

Greens spokesperson for healthy oceans, Senator Peter Whish-Wilson said:

“Tanya Plibersek promised Australia would take a global leadership role in ocean protection, and now is the exact time for her to act on that promise. 

“Sadly talks to pass the UN High Seas Treaty have failed, but it’s not too late for Tanya Plibersek to convene an emergency meeting with UN member states and take a true leadership role in protecting the world’s oceans and marine life. 

“Ultimately the fate of the oceans depends on global action on climate change, and Australia still has significant work to do to be considered a global leader in this space. 

“For instance, Australia likes to talk a big game on marine protected areas – which have been a key area of the UN High Seas Treaty discussion – but using any other country’s definition of a protected area, Australia’s achievements are laughable because we largely allow oil and gas activities in these areas.

“A failure to make progress on a UN High Seas Treaty now threatens the livelihoods and food security of billions of people around the world. It’s been 40 years since the last international agreement on ocean protection was signed and we can’t wait any longer. 

“I implore Tanya Plibersek to convene an emergency meeting with UN member states and take a true leadership role in protecting the world’s oceans and marine life.”

Foot and mouth vaccine doses arrive in Indonesia

The first shipment of one million foot and mouth disease (FMD) vaccine doses supplied by the Australian Government has arrived in Indonesia.

The doses will be distributed by Indonesian authorities to ensure they are delivered to the areas most in need.

“We’ve been able to match the doses to the FMD strain present in Indonesia. These doses will be highly effective in providing protection to Indonesian livestock,” said Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and Minister for Emergency Management Murray Watt

“This is part of our three-pronged approach to keep Australia FMD-free – helping our neighbours deal with the outbreak, strengthening our biosecurity borders and enhancing our preparedness at home.

“In the months ahead, Australia will supply a further $4.4 million in FMD vaccines as part of a $10 million biosecurity package recently announced for Indonesia,” said Foreign Minister Penny Wong.

“The successful delivery of these vaccines demonstrates Australia’s commitment to supporting Indonesia’s response to the outbreak and underscores the close collaborative relationship between our two countries.”

Commemorative services to mark 20th anniversary of Bali bombings

This year marks the 20th Anniversary of the 2002 Bali bombings in which 202 people, including 88 Australians, were tragically killed, and many others injured.

This anniversary will be a difficult day for many in Australia, Indonesia and around the world, and our thoughts are with the survivors, families and loved ones of those killed.

The Australian Government will host a memorial service at Parliament House in Canberra to mark the anniversary on 12 October 2022.

A commemorative ceremony will also be held on 12 October at the Australian Consulate General in Bali, Indonesia.

We will pay tribute to the courage and resilience shown by so many whose lives were forever changed by these attacks.

The Australian Government welcomes survivors and their family and friends, and the family and friends of loved ones lost, to attend the memorial service or ceremony. The Australian Government also extends an invitation to those involved in the response to the blast to attend the memorial services.

Those who wish to attend these services should contact the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for further information via baliservices2022@dfat.gov.au or by phoning 1300 555 135 (in Australia) or +61 2 6261 3305.

In addition to local services being held around Australia, the Indonesian Government and local communities in Bali will also hold commemorative events.

We also remember the 38 Indonesians who were killed in the bombings. We recognise the ongoing work that Indonesia and Australia do together to counter the scourge of violent extremism, and the strength, courage and cooperation of our peoples.

Greens in Senate won’t rubber stamp Jobs Summit outcomes, want wages lift now

Greens Leader and Workplace Relations spokesperson Adam Bandt has said any deal reached at the Jobs and Skills summit risked becoming nothing more than an ‘historical footnote’ without Greens support, as unless Labor chooses to work with the union-busting Liberals, the only pathway for legislative implementation of Summit outcomes requires Greens support.

Mr Bandt said Australian workers need a wage rise now to deal with the cost of living crisis. Mr Bandt also said the Greens would move to amend any post-Summit legislation to lift wages now, saying a narrow focus on skills and productivity, while important, will leave too many people behind and take far too long to lift the living standards of everyday people. 

Backing the ACTU’s focus on the care economy and their call for industry-wide bargaining, Mr Bandt said the Greens would go even further and push in the Senate for a greater role for government in setting wages across the board, especially in sectors where women are the majority of the workforce.

The Greens Finance and Employment spokesperson, Senator Barbara Pocock, is also attending the summit, and said the upcoming Jobs and Skills summit was ‘doomed to fail’ to lift wages and living standards if it refused to consider the tax and social security system, especially the Greens’ push for free childcare, accusing the Labor government of trying do ‘half a Hawke’, noting that Bob Hawke’s summit resulted in the creation of Medicare only because issues of broader importance to workers were on the table.

Senator Pocock, who is chairing the country’s first ever Senate Select inquiry into Work and Care, will argue at the summit workers need both a pay rise, and practical help with the cost of childcare, health and housing – things that are all essential to participation in work. The Stage 3 tax cuts can be used to fund this, rather than boost the income of the very wealthy and fuel further inequality.

Background

Mr Bandt and Senator Barbara Pocock will attend the summit. Mr Bandt said he will outline further Greens’ proposed reforms to the Fair Work Act that the party will raise as amendments to any post-Summit legislation in a speech to Kingston Reid’s Jobs Summit ‘Fringe Festival’ on Wednesday 31 August in Canberra.

At the opening of Bob Hawke’s summit, the then Prime Minister sought “to seek broad agreement on the relationship between a successful prices and incomes policy and the implementation of policies on industrial relations, job creation and training, taxation, social security, health, education, and the other major community services”.  However, the current government’s ‘Jobs and Skills Summit Issues Paper’ has sought to exclude discussion of many issues relevant to working people, and has relegated the issue of wage growth to a discussion about bargaining (see p. 5) instead of considering more fundamental reforms.

The government is focussed on immediate action to deal with skills and labour shortages, but is failing to offer any similarly immediate solutions to low wage growth. For workers covered by enterprise agreements still in force, any reforms to bargaining may not flow through for up to 3 years, and workers in hard-to-bargain sectors need help lift their wages now.

Mr Bandt’s intervention follows a speech to the National Press Club where he said the Greens will have a greater focus in this term of Parliament on the economy and cost of living, as Labor becomes a centre-right party, the Liberals become a far-right irrelevance and the Greens take the mantle of Australia’s social democratic party. 

The Greens will seek two amendments to the Fair Work Act to lift wages, with further amendments to be announced next Wednesday:
set the minimum wage at 60% of the full time adult median wage, which would result in a new minimum wage of $23.76 per hour, to be phased in by the Fair Work Commission; and
lift minimum wages in women-dominated industries faster, including in the care economy, by guaranteeing that award rates will rise by at least 0.5% above CPI in women-dominated industries.

“Unless Labor chooses to work with the union-busting Liberals, any changes to workplace law will need the Greens in the Senate.

“Summit outcomes could languish as an historical footnote unless they’ve got Greens support.

“The Greens won’t be a rubber stamp for government side-deals with big corporations. 

“If and when any proposals from the Jobs Summit hit the Senate, the Greens will push to change the law to guarantee wage rises.

“Liberal and Labor have spent three decades stripping back awards and now people are struggling. Government can’t keep leaving people’s wages up to the market. 

“The government should treat low wages, especially in the care economy, as urgently as they’re treating skills shortages. 

“We need to lift low wages from the bottom up, not just wait for any future skills reform to trickle down.”

Senator Barbara Pocock, Greens spokesperson for employment said:

“If the test is making working people’s lives better, the summit is doomed to fail unless it lifts low wages now and provides immediate cost of living relief. 

“Instead of the unfair Stage 3 tax cuts, the government should fund free childcare, get dental into Medicare and build affordable housing, giving households real cost living relief immediately.

“Bob Hawke understood that tax, social security and health reform are part of the bigger picture, but this government is only doing half a Hawke.  
“It will be a lost opportunity – and more of the same – if women come out of the Jobs and Skills Summit with actions that go in the wrong direction, like keeping Stage 3 tax cuts that deliver twice the benefit to men than women while refusing to make childcare free. 

“While promising ‘a strong overarching focus on women’s experiences’ and a focus on equal opportunities and equal pay’, the Summit Issues Paper offers no practical pathway forward to improve outcomes for women. It’s a case, so far, of all talk no action. 

“We need pay increases in the fast expanding care and services economy. We need targeted access for women to the expanding skilled jobs sector as the energy transition unfolds across Australia. We need to make childcare free. And we need to improve the supports for workers with caring responsibilities, especially casuals, by giving them not only paid domestic violence leave, but the chance of a paid holiday and sick leave.” 

BIODIVERSITY CERTIFICATES TO INCREASE NATIVE HABITAT AND SUPPORT AUSTRALIAN LANDHOLDERS

The Albanese Labor Government has today announced the creation of a biodiversity certificates scheme.

The scheme recognises landholders who restore or manage local habitat and grants them biodiversity certificates which can then be sold to other parties.

This will operate in a similar way to our current carbon crediting legislation.

The scheme will make it easier for businesses, organisations and individuals to invest in landscape restoration and management.

As companies look to invest in carbon offsetting projects like tree planting, we need to make sure there is a path for farmers and the environment to benefit. 

We need to protect waterways, provide habitat for native species, reduce erosion, protect topsoil, improve drought resilience and create shelter for livestock.

A biodiversity market will also promote management of existing, remnant vegetation that provides habitat for native species.

As the recent State of the Environment report found, Australia’s environment is poor and deteriorating and government cannot foot the bill alone.

The markets for biodiversity and carbon credits will operate in parallel, both regulated by the Clean Energy Regulator. 

Over coming months we will be consulting widely on the detailed rules for scheme – for example the rules on how biodiversity benefits should be measured and verified.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said:

“As we move toward net zero, we are creating a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity – not just to protect Australia’s natural environment but to kickstart a nationwide restoration.

“Our market will be open to all land managers – whether they’re farmers, people interested in conservation or Indigenous land managers.

“This is a chance to support farmers using their knowledge and expertise in a way that benefits us all – a chance to shape a better future.”

Minister for Environment and Water Tanya Plibersek said:

“We want carbon planting projects to deliver broader benefits for the environment. We can provide habitat for threatened species while also helping to address climate change.

“Businesses and philanthropic organisations are looking to invest in projects to protect and restore nature. We need to make this easier.

“Repairing nature is good for productivity. Reducing erosion, protecting topsoil and providing shelter for livestock – it’s all good for business.”

NSW TO BENEFIT FROM $75 MILLION COMMONWEALTH INVESTMENT IN FLOOD MITIGATION

The Albanese Government has today announced a $75 million investment in flood mitigation and infrastructure resilience programs for New South Wales.

The support will be delivered across the 62 local government areas (LGAs) which were disaster-declared after the February-March flood event.

The program is wholly funded by the Commonwealth Government’s Emergency Response Fund, but will be delivered by New South Wales Government agencies, including Resilience NSW, the Department of Regional NSW and the Department of Planning and Environment.

The program includes:

  • $40 million for flood infrastructure: grants for councils and government agencies for flood mitigation projects, including funding for home raising projects.
  • $15 million for flood warning gauges: support for councils and government agencies to install, upgrade and operate flood warning gauges, systems and associated advice to make the community aware of the warning system.
  • $14 million for a levee assessment and improvement program: flood impact assessments of flood mitigation infrastructure damaged by the February-March flood event. These assessments will be used as the basis for flood mitigation repairs and improvements.
  • $5 million for valley level flood assessments: to provide improved information for flood risk management and emergency management decisions, and support improved State-wide understanding of flood risk.
  • $1 million for a flood infrastructure impact assessment and report: to outline flood infrastructure impacts, available information on the relative rarity of the flood at key locations and identify known priority flood risk management measures.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said:

“This funding will help to improve long term resilience in disaster-impacted communities.

“Too often disaster support is provided after a major disaster, rather than being invested earlier to keep communities safer.

“This funding, provided by the Commonwealth and driven by the State Government will ensure mitigation projects in NSW are identified and supported.”

Premier of New South Wales Dominic Perrottet said:

“The NSW and Commonwealth Governments are not only focused on the ongoing recovery efforts, but also on mitigation and preparedness for future weather events.

“These are crucial grants to deliver funding where it is needed most.

“During my many visits to flood impacted communities, I have seen first-hand the importance of government agencies, local councils and community organisations all working together and with locals to help ensure preparedness, response and recovery.”

Federal Minister for Emergency Management Murray Watt said:

“The February-March flood event was unprecedented in its severity and scale.

“This $75 million program of works is an important investment to ensure we’re building back stronger and more resilient than before.

“Since coming to government we have made it a priority to unlock this funding, with this announcement the first time any money has been spent on post-disaster resilience out of the Fund.”

Deputy Premier of New South Wales Paul Toole said:

“This support will ensure our regional communities are armed with the infrastructure, technology and support to  better prepare for future natural disasters.”

“It’s crucial we stay ahead of the game and equip our communities with all the tools we can to keep them safe.”

New South Wales Minister for Emergency Services and Resilience and Minister for Flood Recovery Steph Cooke said:

“By ensuring our infrastructure, roads, buildings, waterways and homes are built to withstand disasters, we can reduce the impact of future extreme weather events and better protect our communities.

“This funding will help keep communities safer by helping to identify and implement priority flood warning and mitigation projects.”

New South Wales Minister for Environment and Heritage James Griffin said:

“This package is a great example of governments working in partnership with local councils to reduce flood risks for local communities.”

ESTABLISHMENT OF INQUIRY INTO THE APPOINTMENT OF THE HON SCOTT MORRISON MP TO MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS

Today we announce that the Government has appointed the Hon Virginia Bell AC to lead an Inquiry into the appointment of former Prime Minister, the Hon Scott Morrison MP, to administer departments other than the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and related matters. 

The Solicitor General found that the principles of responsible government were fundamentally undermined by the actions of the former Morrison Government. The Government is holding the Inquiry to restore and strengthen public trust in our Australian democracy.

The Inquiry will examine and report on the facts and circumstances surrounding Mr Morrison’s appointments to five departments during 2020 and 2021 and the implications arising from them.

It will also examine and report on the practices and policies which apply to ministerial appointments and recommend any procedural or legislative changes which would provide greater transparency and accountability.

Ms Bell is eminently qualified to lead the Inquiry, having served on the High Court of Australia for 12 years, and before that, an extensive legal career including as judge of the NSW Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of NSW.

The Government expects those with knowledge of these events to willingly assist and provide information to the inquiry.

The Terms of Reference for the Inquiry are now available.

Ms Bell will report to the Prime Minister by Friday 25 November 2022.