Divisive voice to Parliament still on Labor’s agenda

The last thing Anthony ‘The Liar’ Albanese needs is another divisive debate on Indigenous relations, but if his corrupt union boss mates have their way, the push for a racist voice in Parliament won’t be going away.

After the flush of victory at the 2022 Federal election Albo burnt a lot of his early political capital with his personal legacy project, also known as the Voice to Parliament referendum.

We all know the story. Far-left extremists tried to insert their neo-Marxist identity politics into our nation’s founding document, the Australian Constitution, and they found a useful idiot in Albanese to help them. He saw it as an opportunity to go down in history as the man who delivered it.

There was just one problem: you can’t change the Constitution at a whim. You need the permission of the Australian people, and a big majority of us ultimately said no despite a well-funded ‘yes’ campaign supported by the government and big corporations keen to show their progressive credentials.

Albo walked away from the bruising result, pretending it was no big deal. The activists wailed incessantly, so confident were they at the beginning we would all just fall into line. They believed they were entitled to what they wanted and blamed everyone but themselves when they failed to get it. They even blamed Albo.

The Prime Minister may have moved on from his spectacular failure, but not the Australian Council of Trade Unions – the peak body for the union movement, of which the Australian Labor Party is merely the political arm. The ACTU has made a submission to a Parliamentary inquiry calling for yet another national representative body for Indigenous Australians “…whether a constitutionally enshrined voice, a legislated advisory body, or a treaty-negotiating assembly.”

The ACTU also wants to move Australia Day from 26 January, where most Australians want it to stay.

How many times does it need to be said? Labor and its union boss mates don’t care that most Australians rejected the voice to Parliament and don’t care that most Australians want their national day on 26 January. Their contempt for our democratic views is plain for all to see.

Evidently this fight isn’t finished. One Nation played a decisive role as part of the campaign which defeated the Voice, and with our new strength, we’re more than ready to step up and defend equal rights for all Australians again.

Visit to Australia by the Prime Minister of Vanuatu

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will welcome Prime Minister of Vanuatu the Hon Jotham Napat to Australia on Monday, 29 June 2026.

This will be Prime Minister Napat’s first official visit to Australia since taking office, and the second time the leaders have met.

This visit will reaffirm Australia and Vanuatu’s commitment to elevate our bilateral relationship.

Prime Minister Albanese will host Prime Minister Napat and his delegation at Parliament House to discuss continued economic, security and development cooperation.

Prime Minister Albanese:

“I look forward to welcoming Prime Minister Napat to Australia to discuss ways to further expand our bilateral relationship.

“Australia and Vanuatu share a deep and enduring partnership based on mutual respect and common values.

“Strengthening our ties with Vanuatu is central to our shared ambition for a peaceful, stable and prosperous Pacific region.”

Stronger powers and double the penalties for world-leading social media law

The Albanese Government is doubling down on platforms that are not doing enough to keep under 16s off social media.

The Government will strengthen the eSafety Commissioner’s information-gathering powers with new legislation and will double the maximum penalty for breaches of the social media minimum age law to $99 million.

Australian parents have led this global movement and we back them to keep our kids safe.

Social media companies have a social responsibility, and they must uphold their legal responsibility in Australia to keep under 16s off social media.

We have already seen more than 5 million under-16s accounts removed, deactivated or restricted since the ban began on December 10. 

However, it is clear that eSafety needs more tools in their belt to take on these billion-dollar social media companies and hold them to account

The new laws will mean the eSafety Commissioner, as the independent regulator, can compel social media companies to provide evidence of what they have done to stop under 16s from getting an account. The enhanced powers will give the Commissioner stronger enforcement and compliance tools and more powers to hold big tech accountable.

The changes will make it easier for eSafety to gather evidence by empowering the independent regulator to demand information and documents, to ensure companies are complying with Australian law.

Importantly this includes information from third parties, such as age assurance or app-store providers, which may assist in validating or testing claims made by platforms.

These changes will provide the Commissioner with more detailed information on what platforms are doing – or not doing – to comply with the social media minimum age law, supporting more effective investigation and potential enforcement action.

The penalty for failing to comply with the information-gathering notices from the Commissioner will also be doubled.

Increasing the penalty for systematic breaches from $49.5 million to $99 million brings it in line with penalties available under competition and consumer law.

eSafety is actively investigating potential non-compliance in relation to five platforms: Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube.  

Australia’s landmark social media reform to protect young people online has started a global movement with countries across the world following Australia’s lead.

the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese:

“Australia is leading the world in our efforts to keep kids and young people safe online.

“I’m heartened by the shift in conversation and the global momentum we’ve seen since introducing the social media minimum age, but it’s clear big tech are not doing enough to comply with the law – there are still too many children on social media.

“These changes reflect the seriousness with which we take any failure by social media companies to comply with our world-leading law.”

Minister for Communications Anika Wells:

“Six months into our world-leading social media law, I am not satisfied that tech companies are doing everything they can to keep under-16s off their platforms.

“Based on the regular updates I receive from the eSafety Commissioner, it is clear to me that social media platforms are adopting tricks straight out of the big tech playbook and doing the bare minimum to get by.

“In response, I am making sure the regulator has stronger tools to get the job done and doubling the fines for non-compliance.

“Social media platforms are some of the richest and most powerful companies in the world, and we’re serious about holding them to account.

“These tough new penalties and powers show we will not back down. Instead, we are doubling down on our efforts to hold big tech to account.”

Greens response to bird flu detected in South Australia

 Sarah Hanson-Young, Greens Senator for South Australia and spokesperson for the environment:

“It’s clear that bird flu has now arrived in South Australia. We are deeply concerned that the cases detected so far could be just the tip of the iceberg.

“The positive case detected at Night’s Beach in Port Elliot is close to both the Coorong, which is already critically endangered, and Kangaroo Island, home to many native species including our precious sea lion population.

“If bird flu takes hold in this region, it could push some of our native birds and wildlife closer to extinction. South Australia’s coastal bird populations have already been devastated by the algal bloom. We cannot afford another ecological catastrophe. 

“Our native wildlife simply can’t catch a break. Between the devastating algal bloom and now the threat of bird flu, our iconic species are facing crisis after crisis.

“At a time like this, it makes no sense to keep destroying the habitat they rely on for survival. If we want to give our native animals a fighting chance, we must stop clearing their natural habitat and start protecting the places they call home.

“Our wildlife is facing an unprecedented crisis. We need a $200 million emergency response fund for wildlife protection now more than ever. This is no time for politics or delay. Our sea lions and albatrosses should not be paying the price for government delay when urgent action could help protect them. 

“We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of past ecological crises. Federal and state governments must heed the lessons of the algal bloom and move quickly to protect our wildlife while we still have time to halt the spread.”

Reckless Labor risks lives as aged care reforms unravel

A Greens-chaired Senate inquiry has slammed the government’s plan to terminate a critical feature of Australia’s aged care system, in yet another blow to Labor’s unravelling aged care reforms.

The consensus report recommended that the government not proceed with its plan to fold the Commonwealth Home Support Program (CHSP) into the newly created Support at Home (SAH) system, which after only eight months is already creaking under the weight of its flaws.

The CHSP is a program that supports more than 800,000 older people with entry-level in-home aged care support that helps them live independently. Funded by government grants paid directly to providers, it focuses on reablement, keeping recipients out of more intensive care for longer.

The scathing report, tabled yesterday, clearly spells out the catastrophic consequences Labor’s proposal will have for older Australians, particularly First Nations people and regional, rural and remote communities.

Some of the most pointed criticisms include:

“[I]f similar changes are made to the existing co-contribution model for CHSP 
services, this will significantly increase service costs, resulting in older people, particularly those who face the greatest vulnerability, foregoing necessary care when they need it in order to afford other basic essentials. This in turn would entirely undermine the preventative intent of the CHSP by further accelerating cognitive and physical deterioration, driving older people into higher cost and more intensive models of care and hindering independence.” – Natalie Siegel-Brown, Inspector-General of Aged Care

“Most CHSP providers are not-for-profits or charities and are often delivering early childhood services or homelessness services, saying: ‘We’ll just do those things. We won’t do aged care anymore because it’s too hard.’ That would be an absolutely devastating blow, particularly to small communities.” – Tom Symondson, Ageing Australia

“Small, specialised, and community-based organisations are particularly vulnerable. The loss of such providers would erode critical community infrastructure, remove local capacity, reduce choice for older people, and leave entire regions or communities without essential services.” – Australian Association of Gerontology

The inquiry also heard that the government had not produced any modelling to show that such a transition is even possible, let alone desirable, while they had also failed to produce a clear plan or timeline for its implementation.

Support at Home is already buckling, with a waitlist of over 200,000 and older people all over the country forced to abandon critical in-home supports because of soaring co-payments. 

Labor has been forced into several humiliating backdowns on aged care in the past 12 months, including being forced by the parliament to release 20,000 more home care packages, backtracking on some co-payments, and launching a rapid review into its disastrous assessment algorithm.

The Greens were alone in their opposition to Labor’s Aged Care Act when it passed through parliament in November 2024.

Australian Greens Older People spokesperson Senator Penny Allman-Payne:

“Labor’s reckless proposal to kill off the CHSP has no friends. Advocates, providers, unions, experts, First Nations organisations, local governments – no one wants this.

“By rushing into yet another massive change to the aged care system without adequate data or a clear plan, Labor is putting older people’s lives at risk.

“It is entirely inconceivable how Support at Home – a system already under massive strain – will cope with an additional 800,000 people being forced onto it as soon as a year from now.

“Nearly a million people will suddenly find themselves trapped in a rationed, market-based system, treated like revenue streams and forced to make choices about what essential care or support they’ll have to sacrifice.

“This model is more of the same right-wing market fundamentalism that Labor is in love with, despite the fact that it consistently fails to meet people’s care needs.

“The CHSP provides a vital service affordably to older Australians. Instead of eliminating it, Labor should listen to the evidence and start funding it properly.”

Victorian Greens call for a moratorium on all new large scale data centres

The Victorian Greens have called for a moratorium on all new large scale data centres in Victoria. 

It comes as mega data centre corporation, NEXTDC, bought $165 million worth of land previously earmarked for thousands of new homes on the outskirts of Geelong. 

There are currently eight large-scale data centres operating in Victoria but the state is expected to see at least twenty-one operating by 2035. 

The Greens have raised the alarm that impacted communities are not being meaningfully consulted. 

AI data centres have a huge environmental footprint. They use massive amounts of water and energy and impact biodiversity. They will keep Victoria hooked on coal and gas for longer and even require new gas turbines on site. 

The Greens are concerned that power hungry AI data centres are being built in communities, filling neighbourhoods with more trucks, air pollution, constant noise, and raising serious concerns about access to drinking water. 

The Greens say unregulated AI is leading to workers losing jobs, creators having their work stolen, and personal data being harvested by big corporations. 

The Greens have also raised concerns that these mega AI data centres are being used by massive tech companies, some of whom use their technologies for mass surveillance and autonomous weapons of war. 

The Greens are supporting a community led Town Hall Meeting on Thursday 26 June, to stop the Plumpton AI data centre planned for Melbourne’s West.

Greens Candidate for Western Metropolitan, Brittney Henderson: 

“We’re watching communities that will be most impacted by these AI data centres, learn about these projects in real time. People in the West are scared and angry, and they should be. The air we breathe, the food we grow, and water we rely on as a drought prone country is at risk.”

“Labor uses the West as its dumping ground. We will not be taken for granted. We’re talking to people on the ground, we’re making sure the community is armed with the information and confidence to fight these massive AI data centres. If Labor won’t represent us, it’s time to move aside.”


Greens MP for Western Victoria, Sarah Mansfield:

“The Greens are calling for a halt on all new AI data centres until communities are meaningfully consulted and there is a plan to prevent harm to the environment, cultural heritage, and our climate.”

“Jacinta Allan’s Labor Government has rolled out the red carpet for hyperscale AI data centre corporations with no regard for the impact on local communities, cultural heritage, renewable energy targets and the environment.”

Greens call for a moratorium on the building and approval of data centres in Australia

Senator for SA and Chair of the parliamentary inquiry into artificial intelligence and data centres, Sarah Hanson-Young:

“The big AI companies are getting their hooks into governments at all levels and we need a pause to allow time for public consultation and proper parliamentary scrutiny.

“We need a moratorium on the building and approval of new data centres in Australia until we get the regulations right.

“Today we have seen the SA Malinauskaus Government show they are prepared to sell out South Australia’s clean energy reputation to build more energy sucking data centres.

“The SA Government’s announcement is nothing more than greenwashing, talking up renewables without delivering any commitment to power the new data centres with renewable energy. Their gas mates at Santos are no doubt lining up to ‘bring new energy supply online’ keeping polluting fossil fuels in the system even longer.

“We need a real plan to protect our drinking water and precious River Murray. As the driest state on the driest continent we cannot just hand our water over to big tech.

“Meanwhile in Canberra, Industry Minister Tim Ayres failed to rule out doing a deal with AI companies allowing them to have an exception to copyright laws. This would sell out Australian artists and creative industries.

“We are sleep walking into an AI crisis. Until Australia’s laws are up to the task of regulating the big tech bros and their power-hungry data centres, they should not be given the greenlight to drain our power and water.

“We failed to regulate the big social media companies and are now seeing the massive harm that they can cause. We cannot make the same mistakes with AI companies. Governments must regulate this industry.

“Power hungry data centres are going to be a massive setback in the country’s renewable energy transition. This will eclipse all the work, particularly done by South Australians, to install rooftop solar and build a grid based almost wholly on renewables.

“Until we have proper regulations for the use of energy and precious water and proper protections for Australian artists and businesses we cannot allow a tech bro free for all. Until the necessary safeguards are in place and Australia’s resources are protected, approval and development must be paused.

“Submissions to the Senate inquiry into data centres are currently open. This inquiry will bring some much needed parliamentary scrutiny to this rapidly growing industry.”

Labor to ram union tax through the Parliament

The Albanese Government is attempting to sneak a new union procurement regime through Parliament by using Fair Work Commission reforms as a cover for it.

These powers risk making procurement uncompetitive, adding a union tax to money future Governments spend.

Labor is seeking to gag debate and rush the Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No 1) Bill 2026 through without scrutiny.

The Coalition supports practical reforms to help the Fair Work Commission deal with growing workloads and unnecessary delays.

We do not support the unrelated union procurement tax Labor has inserted, which would have governments to preference businesses with union-backed enterprise agreements when awarding taxpayer-funded contracts and grants.

Shadow Minister for Employment and Industrial Relations Senator Jane Hume said these provisions risk embedding a national CFMEU tax through Commonwealth procurement. 

“Labor are trying to sneak a national CFMEU tax through this Parliament, a regime that has cost taxpayers when it has been implemented elsewhere,” Senator Hume said.

“We support measures that improve the functions and efficiency of the Fair Work Commission that are in this Bill. But Labor are attempting to use them to sneak through this dodgy union procurement measure.

“Minister Rishworth must explain why she is tying the right for the government to discriminate in favour of union mates, to clearing the backlog for workers and small business at the Fair Work Commission,” Senator Hume said.

Shadow Assistant Minister for Employment and Industrial Relations Zoe McKenzie MP said Labor was ignoring the lessons from the CFMEU scandal.

“The Watson Report exposed serious allegations of corruption and misconduct linked to the CFMEU’s influence over enterprise agreement arrangements in the construction industry,” Ms McKenzie said.

“After Victoria’s $15 billion CFMEU corruption scandal, Australians have every right to ask: how many billions of taxpayer dollars is Labor prepared to expose to the same risks?

“Parliament should be closing the door on the culture that enabled corruption and inflated costs – not opening a new one through Commonwealth procurement,” Ms McKenzie concluded.

The Coalition will move amendments to remove the procurement provisions and will introduce legislation containing only the Fair Work Commission reforms.

If Labor is genuine about reducing delays at the Fair Work Commission, it should support those reforms on their own merits 

Government another step closer to delivering tax reforms

The Albanese Government is another step closer to delivering its tax reforms for workers, home buyers, and businesses. 

These reforms will make it easier for Australians to buy their first home, cut taxes for over 13 million workers, and better align the tax treatment of labour and asset income.

Today the Greens have confirmed they will support passage of the first tranche of tax reform legislation.

It is now a question for the rest of the Parliament whether they will get on board with tax cuts for workers and a fairer tax system for first home buyers.

The three right wing parties voted against these tax cuts and in favour of big tax breaks for property investors in the House, and now they’re planning to vote the same way in the Senate which will mean voting against tax concessions for small businesses as well.

Government amendments to the legislation will mean all 2.7 million active small businesses and 98 per cent of all active businesses will be eligible for generous Capital Gains Tax (CGT) concessions.

The Government will make a number of additional amendments, in line with our announcement on 18 June, to provide as much certainty on the implementation details as possible.

The Government will also support amendments to the NDIS legislation to clarify the implementation of the reforms. 

In addition, the Government has agreed to support an amendment that will be moved by the Greens to ban future limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBAs) for residential property by superannuation funds. 

Superannuation funds are generally prohibited from borrowing money to invest, with the exception of LRBAs that are used by SMSFs. 

Multiple inquiries have raised concerns that these arrangements raise risks for superannuation investors, including the 2014 Murray Financial System Inquiry conducted for the Coalition, and limiting new arrangements going forward will help protect people’s savings.

These arrangements constitute less than 1 per cent of total residential property borrowing and less than half a per cent of new residential borrowing each year.

These changes don’t in any way change the tax arrangements for superannuation, don’t impact any existing SMSF borrowing arrangements and provide time to finalise arrangements that are in train.

Labor built superannuation and we’ll always look to make it stronger and fairer, and agreeing to these changes will reduce the risks to retirement savings while also securing passage of these important reforms to make the tax system fairer.

Passage of this important legislation this fortnight will provide workers, businesses and investors certainty about the core tax settings that will apply from 1 July 2027.

The Government will continue to develop further tranches of legislation to implement the Budget tax reform package, consistent with the process for legislating other large tax reform packages in the past.

Paid Parental Leave to expand to 6 months

One week to go: Bundle of joy for new parents as paid parental leave expands to 6 months

In one week, the Albanese Labor Government will deliver a major expansion of Paid Parental Leave, helping new parents spend more time at home with their newest family member.

From 1 July eligible families will be able to access up to 26 weeks of Paid Parental Leave, backed by the Government.

Thanks to Labor’s changes, families accessing the full entitlement will receive almost $30,000 across their Paid Parental Leave.

This is more than double the entitlement available to families before Labor came to government.

The changes that come into effect on 1 July mean: 

  • More time – parents welcoming a new baby or adopting a child will be able to access up to 26 weeks of Paid Parental Leave, giving families more precious time at home with their newest member.
  • More money – parents receiving Paid Parental Leave will receive a higher rate of payment from 1 July, increasing to $1,004.70 per week. Parents have also received superannuation on their Paid Parental Leave since 1 July last year.
  • More people eligible – annual income limits for Paid Parental Leave will rise, with the individual income limit increasing to $186,487 and the family income limit increasing to $386,525.

Since the expansion of the Paid Parental Leave scheme began, parents of more than 460,000 children have already benefited.

From 1 July, 2.6 million Australians will also benefit when a range of social security payments, thresholds and limits increase.

At a time when global uncertainty has placed pressure on households, these changes will deliver more money in the bank and help many cover the cost of essentials.

Over 1.2 million families with children will receive a boost to their Family Tax Benefit payment to help them with the cost of raising their children.

The maximum rate for Family Tax Benefit Part A will increase to $235.48 per fortnight for each child aged under 13, and to $306.46 per fortnight for each child aged 13 and over.

For Family Tax Benefit Part B, the maximum rate will rise to $200.34 per fortnight for families with a youngest child under five, and to $139.86 per fortnight for families whose youngest child is aged five or older.

Income and assets thresholds will increase for a range of recipients, including pensioners and Parenting Payment Single recipients. This means recipients will be able to have higher levels of income and assets before their payments are affected.

More information on new payment rates and thresholds is available on the Department of Social Services website.

the Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese:

“The first months with a new baby are precious. My Government is making it easier for parents to spend that time together.

“That’s why we’re expanding Paid Parental Leave again from 1 July, giving parents more time at home with their newborn and more support when they need it most.

“It was Labor that created Paid Parental Leave, and it’s Labor that’s continuing to strengthen it for Australian families.

“This is good for business, good for families and good for our economy.”

the Minister for Women, Katy Gallagher:

“The Albanese Government has consistently put Australian women at the heart of our priorities, and from July 1 they will be even better off.

“By expanding Paid Parental Leave we are making the scheme stronger, fairer and better suited to the way modern families share care.

“These changes give parents more time, more flexibility and more financial security, while helping make caring responsibilities more equal between women and men.”

the Minister for Social Services, Tanya Plibersek:

“Labor’s changes to Paid Parental Leave mean working parents get more time off and more money when they welcome a new arrival into their family.

“It was a Labor Government that introduced Paid Parental Leave in this country, and now it’s the Albanese Labor Government expanding it to six months of leave.

“Labor will keep delivering real change that helps Australian families.”