Category: Australian News

The Victorian Greens say new research showing barely half of Victoria’s rental properties meet minimum standards proves that renters need stronger protections, including rent caps, so they can ask for repairs without fearing financial retaliation.

New research from La Trobe University found only 54 per cent of audited rental properties met Victoria’s minimum rental standards, with mould, dampness and bathroom conditions among the most common areas of non-compliance.

Almost seven in ten people who rent privately worry about asking for repairs in case they face a rent increase, according to research by the ACOSS/UNSW Sydney-led Poverty and Inequality Partnership, National Shelter and the National Association of Renter Organisations (NARO).

The Greens say the findings reflect what renters have been telling them for years: too many people are living with mould, leaks, broken fixtures and unsafe conditions, but are reluctant to push for repairs because they fear their rent will simply be increased at the next opportunity.

Victorian Greens housing spokesperson Gabrielle de Vietri said renters should not have to stay silent about unsafe or unhealthy living conditions just to keep a roof over their heads.

Victorian Greens Housing Spokesperson Gabrielle de Vietri:

“These findings confirm what renters have been telling us for years – renters are often too scared to ask for repairs because the landlord can simply jack up the rent.”

“No one should have to choose between living with mould, leaks and broken fixtures or risking a rent increase they can’t afford.”

“In the past five years rents have gone up 2.5 times faster than wages. Renters are spending too much of what they earn just paying their rent.

“You can have all the minimum standards you like but property investors have tenants on a tight lead because they have all the power. The risk of an unlimited rent is just too much for most renters – they’d rather stay silent than go back out and compete for another home.

“Jacinta Allan’s Labor Government can talk about renters’ rights all it likes, but it means nothing when renters are too scared to exercise them. The Greens have been saying this for years, we need to cap rents.”

The Victorian Greens say Labor’s so-called “affordable housing” system is broken and that if the Allan Labor Government is serious about making housing affordable it should cap rents and build more public housing.

It comes as the Allan Labor Government announced changes to its Affordable Housing Rental Scheme, including lowering rent thresholds and extending lease lengths only in government operated homes.

However, this only affects one affordable housing program and the Greens say it does nothing to force developers to adopt genuinely affordable definition of “affordable” or address the broader problem that much of Victoria’s so-called “affordable housing” is still not genuinely affordable.

Across Victoria, developers and housing providers are delivering affordable housing through a range of different schemes, using different definitions of affordability and different methods of setting rent. In many cases, rents are not linked to what people actually earn, but instead to varying definitions of “market rent”.

The Greens say that without a clear statewide definition for both government and private developments , affordable housing has become a catch-all label that can be applied to housing that remains unaffordable for many Victorian renters.

In 2024, the parliamentary inquiry into rental and housing affordability recommended the Victorian Government legislate a clear and consistent definition of affordable housing to be adopted across all government departments, policies and agreements with the private sector.
Nearly two years later, Labor has failed to implement the recommendation.

The Greens say the lack of a clear definition has created loopholes that allow private developers and housing providers to access government grants, taxpayer subsidies and public land while continuing to charge rents that many Victorians cannot afford.

The party says that if Labor genuinely wants to make housing affordable, it must stop outsourcing affordability to the private market, cap rents and invest in a major expansion of public housing, where rents are linked to income and people have genuine housing security.

Victorian Greens Housing spokesperson Gabrielle de Vietri:

“Victoria’s affordable housing system is broken. Labor can’t tell Victorians exactly what affordable housing even means because there is no consistent definition.”

“So-called affordable housing has become a catch-all label that sounds good in a press release, but when developers put these homes on the market they don’t pass the pub test of what most people would actually consider affordable.”

“The only genuinely affordable homes are public homes, where all rents are linked to income rather than whatever version of market rent a developer decides to use.”

“If Labor was serious about making housing affordable, they would cap rents, build public housing and stop relying on profit-driven developers to deliver affordability.”

The Albanese Government has signed a $72 million contract with Rheinmetall NIOA Munitions to establish a new forging capability to produce large calibre ammunition for the Australian Defence Force (ADF) in Queensland, continuing its commitment to locally manufactured guided weapons and explosive ordnance (GWEO).

The new forging capability for 155mm M795 projectiles will be established at the contractor owned, contractor operated forge in Maryborough, Queensland. It will begin operating by the end of 2028 and is expected to produce an initial 15,000 rounds a year, with the capacity to scale up to higher volumes.

The establishment of this capability will create up to 50 highly-skilled, well paid jobs during the construction and initial operation of the forge, and will upskill and enhance the existing workforce at the Maryborough site.

The 155mm M795 projectiles manufactured at this facility will directly support the ADF, for use in military platforms including in the M777A2 Lightweight Towed Howitzer and the AS9 Huntsman self-propelled howitzer.

Today’s announcement means that by the end of 2028, Australia will have two large calibre forging capabilities ensuring a sovereign, reliable and modern manufacturing capability supporting Australian-made products for our ADF and providing export opportunities to international partners.

This is direct investment in Australia’s manufacturing industry, and is delivering the Albanese Government’s commitment to a Future Made in Australia.

Domestic forging also ensures Australia has control of the supply chain and will always have access to forged projectiles, reducing lead times and better equipping the ADF in times of conflict, in line with the 2026 National Defence Strategy and Integrated Investment Program’s focus on resilience and self-reliance.

The Government is also announcing a $9.2 million investment in Thales Australia to modernise and refurbish the existing naval 5-inch production line at facilities in Benalla, Victoria. This investment will see new automated equipment and lathes incorporated into the production line. 

These initiatives are backed by an investment of $26-36 billion over the next decade through the 2026 Integrated Investment Program. The projects deliver on the 2026 National Defence Strategy priorities to build GWEO stocks, strengthen supply chains and support domestic manufacturing capability.

Deputy Prime Minister, Richard Marles:

“We are proud to be partnering with Rheinmetall NIOA Munitions to boost domestic manufacturing of 155mm M795 artillery projectiles in Australia, further strengthening our sovereign capabilities and supporting high-skilled, well paid jobs.

“The modernisation and refurbishment of our naval 5-inch production line at our facilities in Benalla highlights our enduring and longstanding partnership with Thales Australia.

“Together, these two industrial forging capabilities will further enhance Australia’s self-reliance.

“We look forward to working with Rheinmetall NIOA Munitions on this significant first step which will reshape the future of munitions manufacturing in Australia.”

The third Security Policy Consultations between the Foreign and Defence Ministries of Australia and Germany convened today on 8 June 2026 at the level of Ministers. The Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs of Germany, Dr. Johann Wadephul, and the Federal Minister of Defence of Germany, Boris Pistorius, welcomed the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence of Australia, the Hon Richard Marles MP, and the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Australia, Senator the Hon Penny Wong, to Berlin.

Australia and Germany are determined to address common and similar security and regional challenges in close cooperation, based on shared values and interests, including through our increasingly close bilateral cooperation, with the aim of promoting international peace, stability and the rules-based international order.

Global Security Challenges

Ministers unequivocally condemned Russia’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine and demanded its complete and unconditional withdrawal. Both countries reaffirmed their call for a comprehensive and unconditional ceasefire as a first step towards a just and lasting peace and underscored their continued steadfast support for Ukraine. Ministers agreed that such support remains crucial, including via NATO. They called on support from the international community to increase the pressure on Russia, including for third countries to cease their direct and indirect support to Russia’s military, and for those with influence on Russia, particularly China, to play a positive role in achieving a just and lasting peace.

Against the backdrop of expanding conflict and escalating humanitarian impacts in the Middle East, Australia and Germany called on all parties to uphold international law and protect civilian life. Ministers unequivocally condemned Iran’s dangerous escalations, particularly in and around the Strait of Hormuz, its attacks against merchant vessels, and threats of further attacks. They recognised the severe disruptions to the global economy and supply chains, and reaffirmed their shared commitment to open markets and rules-based trade in energy resources, liquid fuels, and downstream commodities. Ministers reiterated their support for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict and urged Iran to immediately and unconditionally restore free, safe and toll-free passage through the Strait, based on international law.

Ministers recognised that economic security is critical to national security. They highlighted the importance of coordinated, strategic action aimed at building shared economic resilience working with like-minded powers.

Indo-Pacific Cooperation

Ministers committed to building resilience through encouraging deeper cooperation between Europe and the Indo-Pacific, including with like-minded partners. They underlined the pivotal role of international law as the foundation of the international order and reaffirmed the importance of freedom of navigation and overflight as enshrined in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, noting that the 2016 South China Sea Arbitral Award is final and binding on the parties.

Ministers underscored the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and reaffirmed their shared opposition to any unilateral action to change the status quo by force or coercion. They reaffirmed that differences should be managed through dialogue and supported Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organisations as a member where statehood is not a prerequisite, and as an observer or guest where it is.

Ministers agreed to continue working together to support a peaceful, stable and prosperous Pacific region. They reaffirmed their shared commitment to COP31 including the importance of the pre-COP in the Pacific and global support for Pacific island countries’ resilience.

Defence Cooperation

Ministers recognised the deteriorating international security environment and underscored the importance of strengthening defence cooperation. They committed to enhancing how our militaries exercise and cooperate, including by facilitating the movement of defence personnel and equipment through our respective territories and removing unnecessary barriers to operational collaboration. Following agreement in April 2026 to pursue a status of forces agreement, today Ministers announced the formal commencement of negotiations towards, and shared commitment to, reaching in-principle agreement of the text by the end of 2026. They also agreed to continue exploring opportunities for enhanced cooperation in space, discussed ways to bolster their defence industrial bases, and reaffirmed their close and trusted partnership in strengthening supply chain resilience and promoting economic growth.

Cybersecurity and Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference

Ministers discussed the importance of cooperating on countering cyber and hybrid threats, as well as foreign information manipulation and interference, recognising the impacts of these challenges on democratic institutions and processes. They committed to ongoing cooperation to build collective responses, including in multilateral fora, to promote resilient, healthy, open, and fact-based environments

Multilateral System

Ministers reaffirmed their steadfast support for international law and multilateral institutions, in particular the United Nations. Regarding the UN80 Initiative, Australia and Germany will work together and with partners, as well as with the United Nations and its agencies, in driving forward reform to build a more effective and efficient UN.

They also reiterated their strong commitment to the multilateral economic and trading system, including the World Trade Organization and the G20.

Estimates exposes shambolic Albanese Budget 

The shambolic Albanese Government Budget continued to unravel in the second week of Senate Estimates hearings with Ministers and officials unable to explain basic details or give adequate reasons for decisions that have angered the nation.

The key Economics committee heard alarming and often contradictory evidence from what the Albanese Government has been trying to sell to the public.

Simple questions about how the tax changes work remain unanswered or are clouded in confusing explanations.

Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, Senator Michaelia Cash said: “The more this Budget is interrogated the worse it looks.”

“The Australian people have called out the Albanese Government for a Budget built on lies and fraud and nothing they said during Estimates could explain their decisions,’’ Senator Cash said.

Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, Senator Anne Ruston said: “The Opposition has been able to hold the Albanese Government to account across all portfolios, despite this Labor government’s aversion to transparency.’’

“While Labor members in the House of Representatives were voting 11 times against the Coalition’s lower taxes, including our Tax Back Guarantee, their Senators were either dodging questions or doing a poor job of explaining their budget at estimates,’’ she said. 

Treasury Secretary confirms Prime Minister either does not understand his tax changes, or is lying about them

Under questioning from Shadow Finance Minister Claire Chandler, Treasury Secretary Jenny Wilkinson confirmed that contrary to the Prime Minister’s claims, a 30% minimum tax rate was not a feature of the pre-1999 taxation system. The Prime Minister doesn’t have a clue what is in his budget. He claimed that all the government was doing was returning the CGT regime to the pre-1999 system. This is just another Labor Lie.

Government failed to model budget’s impact on productivity

Despite selling the budget as a ‘productivity budget’ – under questioning from the Leader of the Nationals, Senator Canavan, the government was unable to say how the budget increases productivity. This came in the wake of the Treasurer misleading the House of Representatives where he claimed that inflation in the March quarter of 2022 was -2.3%, when it was in fact 0.6%. The Secretary and Finance Minister were unable to explain the productivity impact of the budget and instead referred senators to a “glossy”. This is just another example of Labor not having a clue about what is in the budget, and the impact it will have on Australians. Productivity has declined by more than 5% under Labor, and they don’t have a plan on how to fix it.

Even the public servants who designed Labor’s tax changes can’t explain how they work

Labor has spent weeks claiming its $77 billion tax package is simple, fair and well-designed. But Senate Estimates showed even the Treasury officials who designed the program struggled to explain how the changes would apply in basic real-world scenarios. When Coalition Senators put simple examples to officials, including examples based on the Government’s own Budget papers, the answer kept coming back: “It depends.” Will low-income taxpayers be worse off under Labor’s new minimum 30 per cent tax on capital gains? It depends. That is despite the Government’s own Budget papers showing the tax increase applies to low-income taxpayers like self-funded retirees and part-time working parents. On trusts and other capital gains tax changes, the answer was the same. It depends on the structure, the timing, the taxpayer and the detail. If Treasury’s own tax experts cannot explain Labor’s reforms in plain English, what chance do small businesses, farmers, investors, retirees and families have of understanding them?

Treasurer using Department to do political dirty work… again

It was revealed that Jim Chalmers is using Q&A briefing documents from his department to issue media briefing documents on Opposition policies. Senator Claire Chandler uncovered that the Treasurer’s office requests Q&A briefing documents from the department and then uses them to distribute background information on the Opposition’s policies. These documents confirm that Australians will pay $212 billion more over the next 9 years in income tax because of the stealth tax of inflation. The Coalition’s Tax Back Guarantee would provide an automatic permanent tax cut every year that gets larger when inflation is higher. The Treasurer should spend more time fixing the inflation crisis, productivity crisis, and getting taxes on working Australians down instead of wasting his department’s time preparing secret hit pieces on the Opposition’s plan for lower taxes.

Inflation too high before Iran

The RBA Governor confirmed, again, that inflation was too high before the conflict in the Middle East began. Jim Chalmers might try and blame external factors for all of the economic problems, but that claim just doesn’t measure up to reality. Inflation was too high before the Iran conflict began because of the Government’s addiction to spending. Labor’s economic model is to stoke the inflation, tax the inflation, spend the inflation, and keep the vicious cycle going. Wash, rinse, repeat. The Government’s active inflation agenda is making Australian families poorer. The Coalition’s Tax Back Guarantee would protect Australian workers from bracket creep caused by inflation. It would deliver automatic, permanent and larger tax cuts for every working Australian, every year.

Government failed to assess financial stability impacts on tax changes 

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has told Senate Estimates it was not consulted on the Government’s capital gains and negative gearing tax changes despite its core responsibility being the stability, competitiveness and efficiency of Australia’s financial system. For changes of this magnitude, consulting every relevant authority and agency is not optional, it’s the bare minimum. The Government’s failure to do so should concern every Australian.

Industry Minister refuses to meet with industry affected by tax changes

Industry Minister Tim Ayres has failed to name a single business or start up that he has met with to discuss the impact of Labor’s toxic taxes. Nor could he name a business that has expressed support for Labor’s Budget despite insisting there is “strong support and interest”. At a time when Australian industry requires support, the Albanese Government has its head in the sand.

Labor can’t say when or why it decided to break its promises

With the Treasury Secretary Jenny Wilkinson at the table, Senator Hume attempted to get to the bottom of when the work on Labor’s so-called ‘tax reform’ package began and whether it was done through a hunting license process or not. Minister Gallagher denied media reports that the tax reform process was conducted via hunting licenses. There were few real answers but plenty of defensiveness from Minister Gallagher about the “busy budget session”. 

Ministers Gallagher – responsible for the budget process – and Minister Ayres – responsible for business – repeatedly refused to outline the timeframe or circumstances of their broken promise under questioning across the two weeks. Despite claiming to be ‘upfront’ about why the government broke its promises – Labor refuses to answer basic questions about how and why they decided to break them. 

Tim Ayres does not care about business impacts of tax start ups

Despite business.gov.au receiving more than 355,000 online enquiries since 5 May, Minister Ayres admitted he has not asked his department for the feedback it has received from Australian industry on Labor’s Budget saying, “it’s not a polling exercise”. This is a Minister who is ambivalent about genuine concerns Australian businesses have about Labor’s toxic taxes.

Ayres unaware of Charlton’s roundtables

Meanwhile, Cabinet Secretary, Andrew Charlton, seems to be taking matters into his own hands and doing the Minster’s job for him. Dr Charlton recently hosted a series of industry roundtables in response to concerns about Labor’s Budget. Not only was the Minister not present, but neither he nor his department were aware that Dr Chartlon’s roundtables had taken place. 

Defence refuse to outline capability cuts

The Department of Defence has refused to detail $10 billion of secret cuts to defence capability at Senate Estimates, in further evidence of Labor’s contempt for transparency on defence. Defence officials confirmed that the Albanese Government has cut four projects from the IIP, but refused to outline what these are other than the C-27 Spartan aircraft and Integrated Air and Missile Defence command and control, saying “it is up to the Government to announce that.” Defence also confirmed that 18 unidentified projects had been delayed or de-scoped.

Labor’s 1.2 million jobs created is a lie

In response to questioning from Senator Hume about the latest Labour Force data on Tuesday, officials from the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations confirmed that Labor’s 1.2 million jobs is just keeping up with population growth.

DEWR: I can say that as at April this year, the employment to population ratio was 63.7% as I mentioned before. So that’s 63 per cent of civilians aged 15 and above were employed. That is exactly the same as it had been in May 2022. So unchanged employment to population ratio over that period. 

Senator Hume: So essentially, while the number of jobs has grown, it has grown directly in line with population growth. 

DEWR: In percentage terms, that is, I believe, correct, Senator

$10.2 billion regulatory reduction may never eventuate

Last week, the Department of Finance was unable to provide a timeframe for when this figure would actually materialise. 

Minister Gallagher said: No, it’s 10.2 per year in gross regulatory burden. But, you know, once fully implemented. 

Senator Hume: And when are they expected to be fully implemented? 

Finance: They’ll be implemented over a period, Senator. And of course, a number of these, as the minister has alluded to, will require engagement with the States and Territories. And so this is the estimated burden reduction once all of those are implemented. That that will take some time…

And then in Economics Estimates this week, the Minister again couldn’t give an answer. 

Senator Hume: When do you think 10.2 billion per year in gross regulatory burden will be realised? 

Minister Gallagher: Well, it’s dependent…

Private health insurance fail 

The Albanese Government doesn’t know how many pensioners will be affected by their Budget changes to the private health insurance rebate. Department officials admitted an independent report to Government confirms the additional PHI rebate for older Australians provides value to money to Government. The Government has not modelled the impact on people downgrading their cover nor the impact on public hospitals,

Labor’s brazen behaviour called out 

At 10:01pm, one minute after the Education and Employment Committee had wrapped up for the evening, the media drop for Labor’s Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026 went live. The very same day the Workplace Relations branch of the Department had been at Estimates, as well as the Fair Work Commission. It’s no wonder they chose to introduce the Bill after the relevant witnesses had already appeared though, as they’ve snuck in changes that would corrupt the integrity of Commonwealth procurement, alongside changes to ease the workload of the FWC. Senator Hume raised her displeasure with the Department the very next day.https://www.youtube.com/embed/LkSz2Rrhmus?si=W1ajPVlb-Y2NbwbW

IR missing from Labor’s productivity agenda 

Despite industrial relations settings being a key driver of productivity, Productivity Commission Chair Danielle Wood confirmed the Government had not requested any specific analysis of workplace relations or industrial relations reforms. The Commission also has not been asked to investigate whether Labor’s recent IR changes were affecting productivity. If Labor is serious about lifting productivity, it can’t keep pretending industrial relations has nothing to do with it.

ASIC blames small business as insolvencies surge

ASIC has conceded that corporate insolvencies remain at concerning levels, with more than 10,600 first-time insolvencies recorded in the first nine months of 2025-26 and almost 15,000 businesses entering external administration in FY2025. Under questioning from Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, ASIC acknowledged the significant human and economic impact of business failures and accepted that COVID-related explanations for rising insolvencies had diminished over time. In response, ASIC pointed to poor strategic management, trading losses and poor financial controls as leading contributors to insolvency. Senator Nampijinpa Price challenged this assessment, noting that insolvencies have increased by almost 200 per cent since FY22 and questioning whether thousands of Australian small business owners had suddenly become poor managers at the same time.

Labor’s aged care algorithm says no

The Department of Health and Aged Care deployed an algorithm to determine aged care package classifications without any prior live trial, without consultation with providers, advocates or older Australians, and without being able to explain how the tool was validated or what its acceptable error rate is. The most common complaint from assessors was the removal of human override from the decision-making process, and the Department declined to confirm whether legal advice was even sought before removing that override capability. The Coalition is calling on the Government to release the evidence underpinning the algorithm, disclose how often assessor recommendations differ from algorithm outcomes, and restore meaningful human oversight to the assessment process.

Labor’s faceless aged care revelation

One in four aged care assessments are now conducted remotely with no in-person contact before being fed into the algorithm. The true aged care waiting list stands at nearly 200,000 older Australians – approximately double the figure cited by Minister Sam Rae the previous day. Department officials confirmed the decision to allow an algorithm to override clinical judgment was made as part of the 2024-25 Budget process, with vulnerable Australians living with conditions including ALS and dementia already having their support cut as a result. The Coalition is demanding the Government immediately reinstate human override and take meaningful action to reduce the waiting list.

Inspector-General of aged care 

Labor’s aged care reforms are failing the very people they were meant to protect. The government’s own Inspector-General of Aged Care has exposed a broken assessment algorithm that is locking vulnerable older Australians out of care, with people battling Parkinson’s and dementia waiting over 12 months for a package, and an outrageous situation where only 129 people out of more than 100,000 were deemed urgent enough to prioritise – this is a Labor-made crisis. The Inspector-General also confirmed qualified, trained, human assessors are quitting their jobs in protest over Labor’s faceless algorithm.

Medicare refusal

The Government has refused to provide details on which services will become more expensive under the Government’s cuts to the Medicare safety net.

Labor MPs bullying GPs over bulk billing

The Albanese Government has refused to condemn Labor MPs bullying and cajoling local GPs into bulk billing, even when it they will be financially worse off.

New-born screening 

Labor’s commitment to increase the number of conditions screened under the New Born Screening Program to 80 conditions is still woefully short with just 34 conditions screened, 4 years after making this promise to Australian parents and parents to be.

More Chinese solar under a “Future made in Australia”

Labor continues to push ahead with Net Zero at any cost, conceding it will continue to rely “significantly” on imports of Chinese made solar panels to achieve its aggressive agenda. The Minister says that industry wants the lowest possible electricity costs, but it is his government’s push to Net Zero that has forced electricity costs up 40 per cent, making manufacturing in Australia unviable. This is what a Future Made in Australia looks like under this hypocritical Albanese Government. 

No money and no timeline for Tomago

It has been six months since the Albanese Government announced the bailout of the Tomago Aluminium smelter, yet there was no money for the facility in Labor’s Budget. Despite the pomp and fanfare in December, the Minister was forced to admit that not only was there no money for Tomago – the government doesn’t have a timeline for when support will be delivered. 

Labor’s lack of transparency

Industry Minister Tim Ayres says he does not have “a high level of interest” in what is published on his departmental website – despite officials confirming Mr Ayres’ office is responsible for directing whether transcripts are published or not. It appears the Minister is cherry picking which of his comments go on the public record – with remarks around Tomago and the influence of China on Australian industry notably absent. Under Labor, there is a culture of secrecy and a lack of transparency.

Right-of-entry permit contested 

When questioned by Senator Kovacic, officials confirmed the Fair Work Commission granted a right-of-entry permit to CFMEU NSW Coordinator Dean Riley on 27 May despite the Fair Work Ombudsman opposing the application. The Ombudsman told Estimates it argued Mr Riley was not a “fit and proper person” to hold a permit, citing five separate proceedings involving ten contraventions of industrial laws and approximately $48,000 in penalties. Officials also confirmed the Commission relied in part on evidence from CFMEU administrator Michael Crosby supporting the application, and that the Ombudsman had sought stronger conditions, including automatic revocation if Mr Riley breached workplace laws again, which were not imposed.

Department published Labor political attack material 

DEWR officials admitted a political media release drafted by Minister Giles’ office attacking the Coalition was published on the Department’s official website. Officials conceded the release should not have been published, described the incident as a “process failure” and “human error,” and were unable to fully explain how the material bypassed department safeguards. A detailed timeline was taken on notice.

CFMEU administrator security costs millions 

The Government confirmed taxpayers are funding millions of dollars in security costs for the CFMEU administrator, including a further $5.3 million allocation over two years. The Government defended the decision despite evidence that the CFMEU holds over $215M in net assets, while officials were unable to explain whether the costs could ultimately be recovered from the union itself.

Workplace department underpaid 201 staff

Following questioning from Senator Kovacic in the February estimates, Senator Hume continued scrutiny of DEWR’s underpayment allegations. Officials confirmed that approximately 201 departmental staff have been underpaid and that the Department has spent close to $250,000 on internal audits with McGrathNicol and Cobalt Consulting to identify and remediate the underpayments.

No dedicated anti-Semitism training implemented

When questioned by Senator Hume, DEWR officials claimed no dedicated anti-Semitism training had yet been implemented following recommendations made by the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism almost a year ago. Officials acknowledged they were still awaiting broader APS training materials and could not confirm whether existing programs specifically addressed anti-Semitism.

Corrupt enterprise agreements may remain in force

When questioned by Senator Kovacic about the consequences of former CFMEU NSW Secretary Darren Greenfield’s bribery conviction, officials were unable to explain whether enterprise agreements secured through bribery or corrupt conduct can be cancelled or overturned. Officials could not advise whether workers and employers remain bound by agreements obtained through criminal conduct.

No modelling of Pilbara industrial action impacts

When questioned by Senator O’Sullivan, officials confirmed they were monitoring industrial disputes affecting iron ore operations in the Pilbara but had not undertaken modelling of the potential economic consequences for Port Hedland, Australia’s largest export port. 

Government cannot explain future mutual obligations

When questioned by Senator Hume, officials were unable to explain what specific mutual obligation requirements jobseekers will face under Labor’s new employment services model, confirming major design decisions remain unresolved.

Jobseekers return to Workforce Australia within a year

When questioned by Senator Hume, the Department acknowledged that approximately one in six participants who exit Workforce Australia return to the system within 12 months, raising concerns about the sustainability of employment outcomes.

Mystery over how many students complete courses

Officials confirmed that there had been 742,000 enrolments and 245,783 competitions of Fee-Free TAFE courses but could not confirm whether the remaining 496,217 places are students still studying, on deferment or had withdrawn. Department officials confirmed to Senator Kovacic the reason why they are unable to confirm the remaining figure is because they do not have a set definition of what a “withdrawal” is.

How many TAFE places are going to visa holders?

When questioned by Senator O’Sullivan, officials confirmed while non-citizens are able to access some Fee-Free TAFE places, they do not hold comprehensive data identifying how many Fee-Free TAFE participants are Australian citizens, permanent residents or temporary visa holders.

Government relying on apprenticeship hope

When questioned by Senator Nampijinpa Price, officials acknowledged that they are concerned by the downward trend in apprenticeship commencements however, they conceded their expectation that large employers would maintain apprenticeship numbers following incentive cuts was based on “hope and intent” rather than certainty.

Senate denied scrutiny of workplace laws

When questioned by Senator Hume and Senator Kovacic, officials acknowledged they were aware workplace relations legislation was imminent, despite senators being unable to scrutinise the legislation during questioning.

Young not consulted on tax changes

The Albanese Labor Government has been caught out in Senate Estimates after officials confirmed young Australians were not formally consulted on Labor’s controversial tax changes before they were announced. Despite repeatedly claiming its policies are about “intergenerational equity” and helping young people, Labor did not seek advice from the Office for Youth, nor receive any briefing on the impact of its tax changes on young Australians. 

Mystery cost of PsiQuantum’s abandoned site

Two years after Labor announced $1 billion going to American company, PsiQuantum, all that’s been delivered is an abandoned site and more questions. After repeated questioning in Senate Estimates, the Department of Industry, Science and Resource was unable to tell Australians how much was spent in planning or site preparations at the now abandoned Brisbane Airport site. Instead, the Department said, ‘it’s difficult to give a specific answer to that question’. Australian’s should be concerned that it is ‘difficult’ for the Albanese Labor Government to know how of their money was spent to not deliver a quantum facility.

Aged care assessments

Under questioning from Shadow Minister for Health and Aged Care, Senator Anne Ruston, officials admitted Labor’s aged care assessment algorithm has never been live trialled or validated and could not confirm whether preventing assessors from overriding the tool’s recommendations is legally sound. The Inspector-General of Aged Care also revealed that 99.9 per cent of older Australians assessed for care have been deemed non-urgent, leaving many waiting more than 12 months for support they have already been assessed as needing. In response, Senator Ruston will introduce a Private Senator’s Bill to restore human oversight to aged care assessments.

Claimed savings from AUKUS change withheld 

Defence has withheld projected savings from the updated AUKUS “optimal pathway”. The Secretary declined to substantiate Richard Marles’s assertion that the transition to three in-service Virginia-class submarines would yield “significant savings”. It was later revealed, during an interview with Richard Marles on ABC 7.30, that these “significant savings” will not fundamentally change the cost of the wider AUKUS project, both of which cannot be true. Defence also conceded that quantifying savings remains guesswork until negotiations are concluded.https://www.youtube.com/embed/6qK9pFmYc9w?si=NwBgo1Fqsfa9yVGS https://www.youtube.com/embed/ctlzFQEcEVo?si=OcMJPvUM60oF7WT2

Defence budget relies on uncertain estimates

The Albanese Government’s claimed “historic” increases to defence expenditure are reliant on at least $5 billion of unconfirmed private financing. The Defence Secretary and Chief Financial Officer acknowledged that market testing is in preliminary stages, with no private partners identified and no contracts signed for private financing of major infrastructure projects. Defence was unable to provide a breakdown of how these private investments over the forward estimates. Officials could not guarantee the Defence capability budget would be insulated if current estimates prove optimistic, nor the proceeds from the Albanese Government’s defence estate fire sale.https://www.youtube.com/embed/c_Ex5rCXG-M?si=WgH3N-fswL86fjNJ

Defence refuses to disclose $4.7 billion in secret cuts 

Defence has refused to detail $10 billion of secret cuts to defence capability at Senate Estimates, in further evidence of Labor’s contempt for transparency on defence. Defence officials confirmed that the Albanese Government has cut four projects from the IIP and that 18 unidentified projects had been delayed or de-scoped. Defence officials confirmed net savings from cancelling the C-27 Spartan would be $300m, and around $5 billion was “reprioritised” from Integrated Air and Missile Defence command and control, leaving $4.7 billion in cuts unaccounted for. The Vice Chief of the Defence Force (VCDF) told the Senate that the other projects were “for the government to announce”, making clear he has been muzzled by the Albanese Government. https://www.youtube.com/embed/j4kqIlR5-ws?si=YpI7PXXXKH7Z5ZSd

Minister’s mystery $10 billion “reprioritisation” figure

Senior defence officials, including the Vice Chief of the Defence Force, were unable to verify or explain a $10 billion defence savings figure that was shared by the Deputy Prime Minister during a private briefing with journalists. The figure was widely reported in the media following the launch of the National Defence Strategy, but senior officials expressed surprise when questioned about it by Senator Paterson. Subsequently, the Defence CFO shared that he “thinks” the $10 billion figure was briefed to journalists by the Richard Marles and Pat Conroy, but officials could not confirm whether they had made it up.https://www.youtube.com/embed/aizRlOaOwNk?si=oWrYiV76ca5iocaE https://www.youtube.com/embed/CQaY1Am4-tE?si=nJJAzmVkwDSP7CCr

Prime Minister breached operational security

Defence faced questioning over Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s decision to publicly disclose the presence of three Australian submariners aboard a US Navy submarine during its sinking of an Iranian warship in March 2026. Defence leadership confirmed that while the personnel performed defensive and platform-maintenance duties during the sinking of the Iranian warship, the public announcement went against standard operational security policies. Senior officials acknowledged that operational details are typically strictly protected and reviewed on a case-by-case basis after personnel return. The Prime Minister’s decision to confirm the deployment to the media, and before the crew had been formally debriefed, could set a dangerous precedent, suggesting operational security was set aside for political reasons. The Foreign Minister also defended the Prime Minister’s decision to publicly disclose classified information, directly contradicting the Minister’s own statement to the Senate just 24 hours prior, where she had refused to provide details due to operational security.https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZuCsu9rsaCw?si=v_A8m7QC6iyrsqFi https://www.youtube.com/embed/CTo2QzPCDNk?si=Guum6wMJhetdOgBK

Double speak on AUKUS

The Foreign Minister made it clear that the Albanese Government’s policy of speaking with “one voice” on foreign affairs is really a “both sides of our mouth” policy. The Foreign Minister refused to criticise Albanese Government Minister Josh Wilson MP’s public opposition to AUKUS, which has led to other members of the Albanese Government calling the AUKUS agreement into question within its own caucus. Penny Wong declined to clarify whether the Minister had revised his stance since becoming a Minister or if any disciplinary actions had been taken. This failure to enforce cabinet solidarity is undermining confidence in AUKUS.https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z8K9ANSMU6Y?si=PSXwOpoujcQ3zOO1

More smoke and mirrors on returned ISIS Brides cohort

The Foreign Minister has declined to confirm whether individuals within a specific cohort of returned women with historical links to ISIS are being investigated for offences under the Passports Act. https://www.youtube.com/embed/ar_NODRDHzw?si=evIuyF4sIN_hoVh9

The Rolex of redundancies: $20 million payout 

Officials from the Department of Social Services revealed they will be paying out the Rolex of staff redundancy payouts: $20 million for the 312 staff who have accepted voluntary redundancies this year. Shadow Minister for Families and Social Services, Melissa McIntosh MP said: “The Department is going to hand out the Rolex of redundancy payouts this year. It epitomises the bloated bureaucracy that defines the Albanese Labor Government. For the past four years, this Government went on a public servant hiring spree. There were 172,000 bureaucrats when Labor was first elected, and now there are 217,000. 

ANU lecturer under investigation for social posts 

Questions were put to the Australian National University over a lecturer in Middle Eastern politics who remains on the taxpayer-funded payroll while under investigation for social media posts that allegedly denied the October 7 rape of Israeli women, called the attacks a “Zionist dream time,” and shared calls to wipe Israel off the map.

$2.2b research funding cut confirmed

Department of Education officials confirmed that the government is taking $2.2billion out of research over a decade, following cuts to Australia’s Economic Accelerator.

Unis to be interrogated on Iran drones

High risk research collaborations between Australian and foreign universities have been referred to government agencies for potential “criminal or regulatory follow up”, the Federal Department of Education revealed at Estimates. Shadow Minister for Education, Julian Leeser, said Australian universities’ first loyalty should be to Australia.

Scandal-plagued ANU loses $100m

Scandals at the Australian National University have led to donors and international students walking away, blowing a $100m hole in the budget.

ANU Chancellor selection process

Questions raised after TEQSA told ANU not to proceed with a selection process for a new Chancellor before TEQSA took over the selection process themselves.

One Nation will give the Australian people a stake in our nation’s natural resources, encourage more gas and oil production, establish a national wealth fund for our future, and end net-zero.

This is a bold, long-term vision that will give the Australian people vastly greater returns from their resources and align government objectives with our world-class gas industry.

Australia’s gas reserves are nothing short of a miracle. For a country with only 0.3% of the world’s population, we supply nearly 10% of the world’s exported gas.

One Nation has always fought for a fair return for the Australian people on our country’s natural resources. Australians are rightly unhappy. Despite our enormous resource wealth, ordinary families are not seeing the benefits in affordable energy, reduced debt, or improved services.

Public unrest is building because successive governments have failed to secure a fair share while pursuing policies that risk killing the industry that generates that wealth.

One Nation understands that gas doesn’t magically extract itself. Gas production is only possible with the expertise of private industry. One Nation will work with industry as a partner, leveraging this expertise to get the most out of our incredible resources.

We want more gas, more oil, and more energy to drive our economy forward, pay down our debts, and secure our energy future.

25% EXPORT

Before I go on to our policy, I would like to take a moment to address the other policies that have been put forward.

Senator David Pocock and the Greens party, along with lobby groups like the Australia Institute, continue to call for an industry-destroying 25% tax on gas exports.

The tax would apply to the total value of all gas exports and destroy the economics of the entire industry. That is their goal.

They have drawn a false equivalence with countries like Norway, which share the full risks and rewards with their industry. A model that has succeeded because government and industry partner together, supported by generous tax incentives.

These activists simply want to destroy our gas industry and push their green agenda scam. It’s nothing more than economic vandalism.

They don’t live in reality. They live in a ridiculous net-zero fantasy world, where fertilisers, plastics, medicines, and rubber can be made with the intermittent power from solar panels, and where 1,500-degree furnaces for smelting can be run on wind turbines.

They want gas stopped.

One Nation wants more gas extracted, bigger returns, and real energy security.

Reservation Policy

One Nation has previously considered an East Coast gas reservation policy. However, through consultation with industry and stakeholders, it became clear that it fell short of our policy objectives. The government’s 20% reservation policy will damage onshore development of oil and gas projects. Many of these projects are Australian producers currently supplying the domestic market.

Unfortunately, a domestic reserve may benefit the multinational exporters the most. They can afford to carve off some of their supplies, flooding the domestic market and killing domestic Australian gas companies. A blunt reserve forces inefficient use of our precious resources under their “oversupply” model. We will not destroy the industry with forced oversupply.

Our policy will instead be flexible, allowing surplus gas to be exported when domestic demand is satisfied, building sovereign wealth rather than undermining domestic supply projects. Typical of this government, they have thrust these changes onto existing projects with little to no consultation, damaging their ongoing feasibility.

This policy is a blunt tool that will result in less competition and a less efficient industry. One Nation’s policy will drive more exploration, more development, and more production without pushing out smaller Australian producers.

Our Policy

One Nation is proposing a genuine partnership with the gas industry, from exploration through to production and decommissioning. We will provide a 30% rebate on genuine oil and gas exploration in Commonwealth waters. In exchange, the Commonwealth may take up to 30% equity in issued production licences. This will be the first time that Australians have a genuine ownership stake in the nation’s natural resources.

The Commonwealth would be responsible for its costs as an equity owner and, in turn, be entitled to a proportionate share of production. These costs will include participation in decommissioning, ensuring responsible end-of-life management is planned from the outset to protect the environment and taxpayers. These ownership rights would be 100% owned by a new Commonwealth Special Investment Vehicle, the Australian Natural Wealth Investment Corporation, or ANWIC.

ANWIC will direct its share of oil and gas to Australia’s greatest benefit, selling to critical domestic industries like fertiliser production, energy, and fuel refining, or exporting when the domestic market is well supplied to pay down debt and build sovereign wealth. This flexibility will maximise value for Australians while encouraging industry participation.

One Nation would ensure the ANWIC board consists only of industry experts who have had success in the oil and gas industry, not government-appointed bureaucrats. Any profits made on Australia’s equity ownership will be put into a sovereign wealth fund to reinvest and grow, NOT to be rorted by future governments.

Importantly, ANWIC would only act as a NON-operating equity partner. We recognise that the expertise rests in our world-class industry, and we are there to benefit from their knowledge. ANWIC would also be empowered to invest in current, producing projects.

And before the Greens get excited, this won’t be some socialist takeover. It must pay its way into any existing project under commercial, arm’s-length terms, not under compulsion or coercion. This will be a direct financial investment, not a takeover.

The equity model gives flexibility to support domestic manufacturing or capture high export prices. It also provides the predictability foreign investors need. Japan and South Korea are looking elsewhere because of policy instability in Australia. We must look after our trading partners. South Korea takes our LNG and supplies us with essential liquid petroleum products. Stable partnership policy will keep these vital relationships strong instead of driving capital away.

Under One Nation’s policy, the government will have skin in the game as a true partner to industry, maximising returns to the Australian people.

CLEAR THE WAY

This bold new strategy will be supported by One Nation’s long-standing policies of cutting red, green, black and blue tape, and dumping net-zero targets.

When I consulted gas producers on this policy, they were shocked to be asked their views. One Nation has done more consultation with industry than this government has ever done.

The gas industry has been fighting an uphill battle against net-zero-obsessed governments.

To all the representatives in gas and industry, you will not be spared by trying to satisfy the net-zero zealots. If you accept any form of net-zero or emissions reduction policy, you are signing your industry’s death warrant.

They will not stop until oil and gas in Australia is gone.

One Nation will dump all net-zero policies.

We will abolish the Safeguard Mechanism that fines gas companies for doing their job.

It is actively destroying investment. It sets rigid emission baselines and imposes heavy penalties, often millions per facility, for breaches, even if our gas supports energy security or vital industry.

Companies divert enormous sums to compliance and offsets instead of production and jobs.

Constant rule changes create uncertainty, leading to project delays and cancellations and telling investors Australia is not open for business.

At the same time, insane environmental approval processes, driven by activist litigation and aligned with UN net-zero ideology, are compounding the damage.

Capital is fleeing to places that are rolling out the red carpet, taking jobs and money away from Australians.

Red, green, black and blue tape must be cut.

Approvals will be decided within six months, with certainty.

Vexatious legal claims will not stop vital projects.

One Nation is taking the country in a fundamentally different direction—clearing the way for Australian industry and thinking in generations, not election cycles.

We want more gas unlocked and government as a genuine partner, not an adversary, to the industry.

PRRT

Lastly, the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax has been a failure in the gas industry.

PRRT for offshore gas is not consistent or fit for purpose.

It was designed for oil projects, and its structure does not suit gas economics.

This has led to unstable tax revenues and eroded community trust.

One Nation would replace the PRRT with a simple Commonwealth royalty on wellhead value.

This will give the Australian people a consistent tax take, help preserve the industry’s social licence, and provide industry with predictable costs based on production.

This change will apply only to prospective projects, grandfathering current PRRT arrangements under which billions were invested.

Our policy aims for returns through participation, not ever-increasing taxation.

Conclusion

This policy is a massive shift in how Australia gets returns from its resources.

Australians will have real ownership of their resource assets for the first time, and they will get first use.

One Nation will be a partner of industry, on behalf of the people of Australia, to ensure we have fuel security, cheaper power, and the ability to pay down our debts, while providing the predictability our trading partners need to continue their mutually beneficial relationship with Australia.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence, Richard Marles, and Minister for Foreign Affairs, Penny Wong, will travel to Europe and the United Kingdom as part of the Albanese Government’s work to strengthen Australia’s relationships.

The Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister will visit Germany to meet with their counterparts to discuss regional resilience building, deepen defence strategic alignment, enhance economic prosperity, and a secure Indo-Pacific.

This will be the first joint meeting between Australia and Germany’s Defence and Foreign Ministers since 2021.

The Foreign Minister will then travel to Paris for meetings with her counterpart while the Deputy Prime Minister will attend meetings with his counterpart in Finland.

In the United Kingdom, the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister will join Defence Secretary John Healey, and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper, for the 16th Australia-United Kingdom Ministerial Consultations (AUKMIN).

These discussions will focus on how Australia and the United Kingdom are working together to shape our shared future, including for a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles MP:

“While geographically distant, Australia and Europe’s interests are increasingly interconnected which is why we must focus our partnerships on reinforcing collective deterrence.

“In complex and uncertain times, the United Kingdom remains a critical partner for Australia and we continue to strengthen and modernise our partnership including through the AUKUS partnership.”

Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong:

“The Albanese Government is working harder than ever to strengthen and diversify Australia’s relationships.

“In the face of accelerating contest, a deteriorating strategic environment and global economic stress, we are bolstering Australia’s partnerships, resilience and security while promoting peace and prosperity.”

Australia has today imposed counter-terrorism financing sanctions on three individuals linked to the terrorist organisations Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. 

These sanctions are aimed at making it harder for these terrorist organisations to recruit, fund attacks, and spread their hateful ideology.

The individuals targeted are senior leaders and financial facilitators of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, responsible for directing and financing the terrorist activities of these groups. 

Australia continues to coordinate with a range of partners on these sanctions and other measures against terrorist groups.

We remain unequivocally committed to eradicating terrorism and violent extremism, and to holding terrorist actors to account. 

It is a criminal offence to use or deal with the assets of a listed person or entity, or to make assets available to them. Penalties for a breach of an Australian sanctions law include heavy fines and up to 10 years’ imprisonment.

A consolidated list of sanctions is available on the Department of Foreign Affairs website. 

The Honourable Anita Anand, Minister of Foreign Affairs; Penny Wong, Australia’s Minister for Foreign Affairs; Lars Løkke Rasmussen, Denmark’s Minister for Foreign Affairs; Margus Tsahkna, Estonia’s  Minister of Foreign Affairs; Kaja Kallas, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy; Elina Valtonen, Finland’s Minister for Foreign Affairs; Jean-Noël Barrot, France’s Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs; Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir, Iceland’s Minister for Foreign Affairs; Baiba Braže, Latvia’s Minister for Foreign Affairs; Kęstutis Budrys, Lithuania’s  Minister of Foreign Affairs; Espen Barth Eide, Norway’s Minister of Foreign Affairs; and Maria Malmer Stenergard, Sweden’s Minister for Foreign Affairs; today issued the following statement:

“We express our profound concern over the continued escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and welcome ongoing efforts to implement the ceasefire. The people of Lebanon have already endured immense hardship.

“We call on all parties to exercise maximum restraint, adhere fully to the ceasefire, refrain from actions that could lead to further escalation and ensure the protection of civilians.

“We support the efforts of the Lebanese government to extend its authority throughout the country in line with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, including through the strengthening of Lebanese state institutions and security forces and the disarmament of Hezbollah. Hezbollah must cease its attacks on Israel.

“All parties must respect international law, including international humanitarian law. In this regard, we call on Israel to respect Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to stop its military escalation.

“We further encourage continued engagement with ongoing diplomatic efforts, including those led by the United States and international partners, aimed at securing a negotiated path toward long-term stability and security for both Lebanon and Israel.

“The people of Lebanon and Israel have the right to live in peace, security and dignity, free from the threat of renewed conflict.”

Andrew Braddock MLA will introduce legislation next week to ensure medicinal cannabis patients are treated under the same legal framework as other patients prescribed potentially impairing medications.

The reform will bring the ACT into line with jurisdictions such as Tasmania and announced changes in New South Wales, by shifting to a genuine impairment-based approach to driving safety.

In practical terms, this means people who are prescribed and using medicinal cannabis lawfully will not face criminal charges for driving, provided they are not impaired.

Andrew Braddock, Greens Member for Yerrabi:

“The ACT’s current laws simply don’t stack up. Right now, a person can follow their doctor’s advice, take prescribed medicinal cannabis, and still be treated like a criminal, even when they are not impaired and don’t pose a danger to themselves or others.

“They are not being punished for dangerous driving, but for the presence of a trace amount of a legally prescribed medicine that does not impair driving. Meanwhile, patients taking opioids or benzodiazepines face no equivalent test. That double standard has no scientific basis, and it must change.

“This reform reflects what the evidence tells us: impairment, not mere presence, should be the standard for road safety. Our laws should be based on evidence, not outdated assumptions.

“It will also bring the ACT into line with other jurisdictions. The UK has had a medical defence in place for nearly a decade, Tasmania already treats medicinal cannabis like other prescribed medicines, and New South Wales announcement today shows they recognise the importance of ensuring drivers who are not impaired are not unfairly charged.

“It makes no sense for Canberrans to be treated differently simply because they cross a border. You shouldn’t be able to drive legally in Queanbeyan but risk a criminal charge minutes later in Canberra.

“This reform is about fairness and common sense. People managing serious conditions like chronic pain, cancer, endometriosis, PTSD and multiple sclerosis should not be forced to choose between their medication and their mobility.

“If you are not impaired, you have a valid prescription, and you are taking your medication as directed, you should not be treated as a criminal.

“This change does one simple thing: it puts medicinal cannabis patients on the same footing as everyone else. Nothing more, nothing less.

“The choice now is a political one. The evidence is clear, the model exists, and other jurisdictions are already acting. It’s time for the ACT to catch up.”